3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Measuring health utility in varying pregnancy contexts among a diverse cohort of pregnant women

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To contribute to decision analysis by estimating utility, defined as an individual’s valuation of specific health states, for different pregnancy contexts.

          Study design:

          Cross-sectional analysis of data from pregnant women recruited at pregnancy testing clinics during June 2014–June 2015. Utility was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), PROMIS GSF-derived utility, standard gamble (SG), and time-trade-off (TTO) approaches. Six dimensions of pregnancy context were assessed including: intention, desirability, planning, timing, wantedness, and happiness. Multivariable regression modeling was used to examine the associations between pregnancy context and utility while controlling for women’s sociodemographic and health characteristics.

          Results:

          Among 123 participants with diverse characteristics, aged 27±6 years, with mean gestation of 7.5±3 weeks, few reported optimal pregnancy contexts. Mean utility of the pregnancy state varied across contexts, whether measured with VAS (0.28–0.91), PROMIS GSF-derived utility (0.66–0.75), SG (0.985–1.00) or TTO (0.9990–0.99999). The VAS-derived mean utility score for unintended pregnancy was 0.68 (95% CI 0.59, 0.77). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated significant disutility of unintended pregnancy, as well as all other unfavorable pregnancy contexts, when measured by VAS. In contrast, PROMIS GSF-derived utility only detected a significant reduction in utility among ambivalent compared to wanted pregnancy, while SG and TTO did not show meaningful differences in utility across pregnancy contexts.

          Conclusions:

          Unintended pregnancy is associated with significant patient-reported disutility, as is pregnancy occurring in other unfavorable contexts. VAS-based measurements provide the most nuanced measures of the utility for pregnancy in varying contexts.

          Implications:

          Decision analyses, including assessments of the cost-effectiveness of pregnancy related interventions, should incorporate measures of the utility of pregnancy in various contexts.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0234361
          3163
          Contraception
          Contraception
          Contraception
          0010-7824
          1879-0518
          13 October 2018
          17 August 2017
          December 2017
          01 December 2018
          : 96
          : 6
          : 411-419
          Affiliations
          [a ]Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
          [b ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 203 737 5791 (Work). lisbet.lundsberg@ 123456yale.edu (L.S. Lundsberg).
          Article
          PMC6267929 PMC6267929 6267929 nihpa992143
          10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.003
          6267929
          28823842
          39d381d9-4a5a-48a2-94f3-139eb1ac2580

          For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

          History
          Categories
          Article

          Unintended pregnancy,Visual analog scale,Utility,London measure of unplanned pregnancy

          Comments

          Comment on this article