1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of infections and complications from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In patients with a primary or secondary prophylactic indication, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac deaths (SCD). We retrospectively compared transvenous-ICD (TV-ICD) and intermuscularly implanted subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) associated infections and complication rates together with hospitalizations in recipients with stage 4 kidney disease.

          Methods

          We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients from six German centers with stage 4 CKD who received either a prophylactic TV-ICD with a single right ventricular lead, 49 patients, or a S-ICD, 21 patients. Follow-Ups (FU) were performed bi-annually.

          Results

          The TV-ICD patients were significantly older. This group had more patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias and more were prescribed anti-arrhythmic medication compared with the S-ICD group. There were no significant differences for other baseline characteristics. The median and interquartile range of FU durations were 55.2 (57.6–69.3) months. During FU, patients with a TV-ICD system experienced significantly more device associated infections ( n = 8, 16.3% vs. n = 0; p < 0.05), device-associated complications ( n = 13, 26.5% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05) and device associated hospitalizations ( n = 10, 20.4% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05).

          Conclusion

          In this long-term FU of patients with stage 4 CKD and an indication for a prophylactic ICD, the S-ICD was associated with significantly fewer device associated infections, complications and hospitalizations compared with TV-ICDs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: a systematic review.

            Current guidelines identify people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) as being at high risk for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Because as many as 19 million Americans may have CKD, a comprehensive summary of this risk would be potentially useful for planning public health policy. A systematic review of the association between non-dialysis-dependent CKD and the risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was conducted. Patient- and study-related characteristics that influenced the magnitude of these associations also were investigated. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched, and reference lists through December 2004 were consulted. Authors of 10 primary studies provided additional data. Cohort studies or cohort analyses of randomized, controlled trials that compared mortality between those with and without chronically reduced kidney function were included. Studies were excluded from review when participants were followed for < 1 yr or had ESRD. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study setting, quality, participant and renal function characteristics, and outcomes. Thirty-nine studies that followed a total of 1,371,990 participants were reviewed. The unadjusted relative risk for mortality in participants with reduced kidney function compared with those without ranged from 0.94 to 5.0 and was significantly more than 1.0 in 93% of cohorts. Among the 16 studies that provided suitable data, the absolute risk for death increased exponentially with decreasing renal function. Fourteen cohorts described the risk for mortality from reduced kidney function, after adjustment for other established risk factors. Although adjusted relative hazards were consistently lower than unadjusted relative risks (median reduction 17%), they remained significantly more than 1.0 in 71% of cohorts. This review supports current guidelines that identify individuals with CKD as being at high risk for cardiovascular mortality. Determining which interventions best offset this risk remains a health priority.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.

              Sudden death from cardiac causes remains a leading cause of death among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Treatment with amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been proposed to improve the prognosis in such patients. We randomly assigned 2521 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III CHF and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35 percent or less to conventional therapy for CHF plus placebo (847 patients), conventional therapy plus amiodarone (845 patients), or conventional therapy plus a conservatively programmed, shock-only, single-lead ICD (829 patients). Placebo and amiodarone were administered in a double-blind fashion. The primary end point was death from any cause. The median LVEF in patients was 25 percent; 70 percent were in NYHA class II, and 30 percent were in class III CHF. The cause of CHF was ischemic in 52 percent and nonischemic in 48 percent. The median follow-up was 45.5 months. There were 244 deaths (29 percent) in the placebo group, 240 (28 percent) in the amiodarone group, and 182 (22 percent) in the ICD group. As compared with placebo, amiodarone was associated with a similar risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.06; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.53) and ICD therapy was associated with a decreased risk of death of 23 percent (0.77; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.007) and an absolute decrease in mortality of 7.2 percentage points after five years in the overall population. Results did not vary according to either ischemic or nonischemic causes of CHF, but they did vary according to the NYHA class. In patients with NYHA class II or III CHF and LVEF of 35 percent or less, amiodarone has no favorable effect on survival, whereas single-lead, shock-only ICD therapy reduces overall mortality by 23 percent. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1392606/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2675750/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368363/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1983713/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
                Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-055X
                10 April 2024
                2024
                : 11
                : 1397138
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum , Germany
                [ 2 ]Department of Cardiology and Angiology at Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Academic Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Gelsenkirchen , Germany
                [ 3 ]Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Marien-Hospital Luenen, Academic Hospital of the University Muenster, Luenen , Germany
                [ 4 ]Department of Cardiology, Augusta Hospital Bochum, Academic Hospital of the University Duisburg-Essen, Bochum , Germany
                [ 5 ]Department of Cardiology, Katholische Kliniken Bochum of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum , Germany
                [ 6 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, City, University of London, London , United Kingdom
                [ 7 ]Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen , Germany
                [ 8 ]Department of Cardiology, Elisabeth Hospital Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen , Germany
                [ 9 ]Department of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, Institut für Forschung und Lehre (IFL), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum , Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mate Vamos, University of Szeged, Hungary

                Reviewed by: Roberto Rordorf, San Matteo Hospital Foundation (IRCCS), Italy

                Helmut Ulrich Klein, University of Rochester, United States

                [* ] Correspondence: Fabian Schiedat fschiedat@ 123456aol.com

                Abbreviations BMI, body mass index; CIED, cardiac implantable electronic device; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive proteins; CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HD, hemodialysis; HF, heart failure; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LV-EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SCD, sudden cardiac death; S-ICD, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; TLE, transvenous lead extraction; TV-ICD, transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

                Article
                10.3389/fcvm.2024.1397138
                11040078
                38660482
                3a08bd84-0ae6-4e7a-a41b-727e766a5e4a
                © 2024 Schiedat, Meuterodt, Prull, Aweimer, Gotzmann, O’Connor, Perings, Korth, Lawo, El-Battrawy, Hanefeld, Mügge and Kloppe.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 March 2024
                : 27 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 37, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Cardiac Rhythmology

                sudden cardiac death (scd),implantable cardiac defibrillator (icd),s-icd,device infection,device complication,chronic kidney disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article