3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      General and Vulnerable Population’s Satisfaction With the Healthcare System in Urban and Rural Areas: Findings From the European Social Survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Access to the healthcare system when patients are vulnerable and living outside metropolitan areas can be challenging. Our objective was to explore healthcare system satisfaction of urban and rural inhabitants depending on financial and health vulnerabilities.

          Methods: Repeated cross-sectional data from 353,523 European citizens (2002–2016). Multivariable associations between rural areas, vulnerability factors and satisfaction with the healthcare system were assessed with linear mixed regressions and adjusted with sociodemographic and control factors.

          Results: In unadjusted analysis, the people who lived in houses in the countryside and those who lived in the suburbs were the most satisfied with the healthcare system. In the adjusted model, residents living in big cities had the highest satisfaction. Financial and health vulnerabilities were associated with less satisfaction with the healthcare system, with a different effect according to the area of residence: the presence of health vulnerability was more negatively correlated with the healthcare system satisfaction of big city inhabitants, whereas financial vulnerability was more negatively correlated with the satisfaction of those living in countryside homes.

          Conclusion: Vulnerable residents, depending on their area of residence, may require special attention to increase their satisfaction with the healthcare system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature.

          A literature search was carried out to summarize the existing scientific evidence concerning occurrence, causes, and consequences of multimorbidity (the coexistence of multiple chronic diseases) in the elderly as well as models and quality of care of persons with multimorbidity. According to pre-established inclusion criteria, and using different search strategies, 41 articles were included (four of these were methodological papers only). Prevalence of multimorbidity in older persons ranges from 55 to 98%. In cross-sectional studies, older age, female gender, and low socioeconomic status are factors associated with multimorbidity, confirmed by longitudinal studies as well. Major consequences of multimorbidity are disability and functional decline, poor quality of life, and high health care costs. Controversial results were found on multimorbidity and mortality risk. Methodological issues in evaluating multimorbidity are discussed as well as future research needs, especially concerning etiological factors, combinations and clustering of chronic diseases, and care models for persons affected by multiple disorders. New insights in this field can lead to the identification of preventive strategies and better treatment of multimorbid patients. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multimorbidity in older adults.

              M Salive (2013)
              Multimorbidity, the coexistence of 2 or more chronic conditions, has become prevalent among older adults as mortality rates have declined and the population has aged. We examined population-based administrative claims data indicating specific health service delivery to nearly 31 million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries for 15 prevalent chronic conditions. A total of 67% had multimorbidity, which increased with age, from 50% for persons under age 65 years to 62% for those aged 65-74 years and 81.5% for those aged ≥85 years. A systematic review identified 16 other prevalence studies conducted in community samples that included older adults, with median prevalence of 63% and a mode of 67%. Prevalence differences between studies are probably due to methodological biases; no studies were comparable. Key methodological issues arise from elements of the case definition, including type and number of chronic conditions included, ascertainment methods, and source population. Standardized methods for measuring multimorbidity are needed to enable public health surveillance and prevention. Multimorbidity is associated with elevated risk of death, disability, poor functional status, poor quality of life, and adverse drug events. Additional research is needed to develop an understanding of causal pathways and to further develop and test potential clinical and population interventions targeting multimorbidity. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2013.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Public Health
                Int J Public Health
                Int J Public Health
                International Journal of Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1661-8556
                1661-8564
                08 March 2022
                2022
                : 67
                : 1604300
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Quality of Care and Clinical Networks , Health Directorate of the Tuscany Region , Florence, Italy
                [2] 2 Quality of Care Unit , University Hospitals of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland
                [3] 3 Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics , University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland
                [4] 4 Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab) , Department of Community Health , Faculty of Science and Medicine , University of Fribourg , Fribourg, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Olaf von dem Knesebeck, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

                Reviewed by: Daniel Ludecke, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

                *Correspondence: Lorenzo Righi, lorenzo.righi@ 123456gmail.com 
                Article
                1604300
                10.3389/ijph.2022.1604300
                8938939
                35330661
                3a64d595-34a4-4d72-a9bd-fefef33a2463
                Copyright © 2022 Righi, Cullati, Chopard and Courvoisier.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 June 2021
                : 04 January 2022
                Categories
                Public Health Archive
                Original Article

                Public health
                healthcare system,vulnerability,satisfaction,urban,rural,europe
                Public health
                healthcare system, vulnerability, satisfaction, urban, rural, europe

                Comments

                Comment on this article