0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Spontaneous quantity discrimination in a family-living lizard

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 2
      Behavioral Ecology
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While foraging or during social interactions, animals may benefit from judging relative quantity. Individuals may select larger prey or a patch with more food and, likewise, it may pay to track the number and type of individuals and social interactions. We tested for spontaneous quantity discrimination in the gidgee skink (Egernia stokesii), a family-living lizard. Lizards were presented with food quantities differing in number or size and were able to select the larger quantity of food items when they differed in number but not when items differed in size. We show, for the first time, superior spontaneous discrimination of items differing in number over size in a lizard species, which contrasts with previous findings. Our simple method, however, did not include controls for the use of continuous quantities, and further tests are required to determine the role of such information during quantity discrimination. Our results provide support for the use of the parallel individuation system for the discrimination of small quantities (four or fewer items). Lizards might, however, still use the approximate number system if items in larger quantities (more than four) are presented. Overall, we uncovered evidence that species might possess specific cognitive abilities potentially adapted to their niche with respect to quantity information (discrete and/or continuous) and the processing system used when judging quantities. Importantly, our results highlight the need for testing multiple species using similar testing procedures to gain a better understanding of the underlying causes leading to differences across species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: TheMCMCglmmRPackage

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Behavioral Ecology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1045-2249
                1465-7279
                July 01 2021
                August 19 2021
                April 28 2021
                July 01 2021
                August 19 2021
                April 28 2021
                : 32
                : 4
                : 686-694
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Bern, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
                [3 ]Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
                Article
                10.1093/beheco/arab019
                3a93c1e1-5fd9-4990-ab0b-f5861045e14a
                © 2021

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article