1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modelling direct DNA damage for gold nanoparticle enhanced proton therapy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A computer model of gold nanoparticles within a cell used to assess DNA damage under proton irradiation.

          Abstract

          Gold nanoparticles have been proven as potential radiosensitizer when combined with protons. Initially the radiosensitization effect was attributed to the physical interactions of radiation with the gold and the production of secondary electrons that induce DNA damage. However, emerging data challenge this hypothesis, supporting the existence of alternative or supplementary radiosensitization mechanisms. In this work we incorporate a realistic cell model with detailed DNA geometry and a realistic gold nanoparticle biodistribution based on experimental data. The DNA single and double strand breaks, and damage complexity are counted under various scenarios of different gold nanoparticle size, biodistribution and concentration, and proton energy. The locality of the effect, i.e. the existence of higher damage at a location close to the gold distribution, is also addressed by investigating the DNA damage at a chromosomal territory. In all the cases we do not observe any significant increase in the single/double strand break yield or damage complexity in the presence of gold nanoparticles under proton irradiation; nor there is a locality to the effect. Our results show for the first time that the physical interactions of protons with the gold nanoparticles should not be considered directly responsible for the observed radiosensitization effect. The model used only accounts for DNA damage from direct interactions, whilst considering the indirect effect, and it is possible the radiosensitization effect to be due to other physical effects, although we consider that possibility unlikely. Our conclusion suggests that other mechanisms might have greater contribution to the radiosensitization effect and further investigation should be conducted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gold nanoparticles as radiation sensitizers in cancer therapy.

          Among other nanoparticle systems, gold nanoparticles have been explored as radiosensitizers. While most of the research in this area has focused on either gold nanoparticles with diameters of less than 2 nm or particles with micrometer dimensions, it has been shown that nanoparticles 50 nm in diameter have the highest cellular uptake. We present the results of in vitro studies that focus on the radiosensitization properties of nanoparticles in the size range from 14-74 nm. Radiosensitization was dependent on the number of gold nanoparticles internalized within the cells. Gold nanoparticles 50-nm in diameter showed the highest radiosensitization enhancement factor (REF) (1.43 at 220 kVp) compared to gold nanoparticles of 14 and 74 nm (1.20 and 1.26, respectively). Using 50-nm gold nanoparticles, the REF for lower- (105 kVp) and higher- (6 MVp) energy photons was 1.66 and 1.17, respectively. DNA double-strand breaks were quantified using radiation-induced foci of gamma-H2AX and 53BP1, and a modest increase in the number of foci per nucleus was observed in irradiated cell populations with internalized gold nanoparticles. The outcome of this research will enable the optimization of gold nanoparticle-based sensitizers for use in therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ultrasmall Gold Nanoparticles as Carriers for Nucleus-Based Gene Therapy Due to Size-Dependent Nuclear Entry

            The aim of this study was to determine the size-dependent penetration ability of gold nanoparticles and the potential application of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles for intranucleus delivery and therapy. We synthesized gold nanoparticles with diameters of 2, 6, 10, and 16 nm and compared their intracellular distribution in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Nanoparticles smaller than 10 nm (2 and 6 nm) could enter the nucleus, whereas larger ones (10 and 16 nm) were found only in the cytoplasm. We then investigated the possibility of using ultrasmall 2 nm nanoparticles as carriers for nuclear delivery of a triplex-forming oligonucleotide (TFO) that binds to the c-myc promoter. Compared to free TFO, the nanoparticle-conjugated TFO was more effective at reducing c-myc RNA and c-myc protein, which resulted in reduced cell viability. Our result demonstrated that the entry of gold nanoparticles into the cell nucleus is critically dependent on the size of the nanoparticles. We developed a strategy for regulating gene expression, by directly delivering TFOs into the nucleus using ultrasmall gold nanoparticles. More importantly, guidelines were provided to choose appropriate nanocarriers for different biomedical purposes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Implications on clinical scenario of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization in regards to photon energy, nanoparticle size, concentration and location.

              Gold nanoparticle (AuNP) radiosensitization represents a novel approach to enhance the effectiveness of ionizing radiation. Its efficiency varies widely with photon source energy and AuNP size, concentration, and intracellular localization. In this Monte Carlo study we explored the effects of those parameters to define the optimal clinical use of AuNPs. Photon sources included (103)Pd and (125)I brachytherapy seeds; (169)Yb, (192)Ir high dose rate sources, and external beam sources 300 kVp and 6 MV. AuNP sizes were 1.9, 5, 30, and 100 nm. We observed a 10(3) increase in the rate of photoelectric absorption using (125)I compared to 6 MV. For a (125)I source, to double the dose requires concentrations of 5.33-6.26 mg g(-1) of Au or 7.10 × 10(4) 30 nm AuNPs per tumor cell. For 6 MV, concentrations of 1560-1760 mg g(-1) or 2.17 × 10(7) 30 nm AuNPs per cell are needed, which is not clinically achievable. Examining the proportion of energy transferred to escaping particles or internally absorbed in the nanoparticle suggests two clinical strategies: the first uses photon energies below the k-edge and takes advantage of the extremely localized Auger cascade. It requires small AuNPs conjugated to tumor targeted moieties and nuclear localizing sequences. The second, using photon sources above the k-edge, requires a higher gold concentration in the tumor region. In this approach, energy deposited by photoelectrons is the main contribution to radiosensitization; AuNP size and cellular localization are less relevant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NANOHL
                Nanoscale
                Nanoscale
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2040-3364
                2040-3372
                2017
                2017
                : 9
                : 46
                : 18413-18422
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Cancer Sciences
                [2 ]School of Medical Sciences
                [3 ]Faculty of Biology
                [4 ]Medicine and Health
                [5 ]The University of Manchester
                [6 ]Christie Medical Physics and Engineering
                [7 ]The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
                [8 ]Manchester
                [9 ]UK
                Article
                10.1039/C7NR07310K
                29148554
                3b078573-55a5-4e79-b7e6-72c03a1a5214
                © 2017

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article