1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Debris extrusion by glide-path establishing endodontic instruments with different geometries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/purpose

          Glide-path preparation is an important step during initial endodontic procedure to reduce shaping-instrument fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris produced by glide-path preparation instruments with different geometric designs.

          Materials and methods

          Forty teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were randomly divided into four groups ( n = 10). The working length was standardized at 17 mm from the apical foramen by a flattening reference point. The glide-path was created using repetitive up-and-down movement three times with one of following four selected instruments: One G, ProGlider, a size 15 ScoutRace, and a size 15 stainless-steel K-file. To collect the apically extruded debris, the customized apparatus was used, and the collected debris was stored in an incubator. The weight of the debris was measured using an analytical balance with an accuracy of 0.00001 g. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple comparison test at a significance level of 95%.

          Results

          The ProGlider group produced significantly less debris extrusion relative to the other groups (P < 0.05). The One G and ScoutRace groups showed no significant difference, but debris production was lower than that observed for the stainless-steel group (P < 0.05).

          Conclusion

          Creating the glide-path using nickel-titanium rotary files produced lower amounts of debris extrusion than using manual stainless-steel files. The progressive taper design of ProGlider, the center-off cross-section of One G, and the alternative-pitch design of ScoutRace may have increased the efficiencies of debris removal with minimal extrusion during glide-path preparation. Glide-path preparation using NiTi rotary files have better clinical efficiency than the manual stainless-steel file.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.

            The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the amount of apically extruded debris using rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium instrumentation systems. Eighty human mandibular central incisors were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 20 teeth per group). The root canals were instrumented according to the manufacturers' instructions using the 2 reciprocating single-file systems Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and the 2 full-sequence rotary Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) instruments. Bidistilled water was used as irrigant. The apically extruded debris was collected in preweighted glass vials using the Myers and Montgomery method. After drying, the mean weight of debris was assessed with a microbalance and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and the post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test. The time required to prepare the canals with the different instruments was also recorded. The reciprocating files produced significantly more debris compared with both rotary systems (P .05), the reciprocating single-file system Reciproc produced significantly more debris compared with all other instruments (P < .05). Instrumentation was significantly faster using Reciproc than with all other instrument (P < .05). Under the condition of this study, all systems caused apical debris extrusion. Full-sequence rotary instrumentation was associated with less debris extrusion compared with the use of reciprocating single-file systems. Copyright © 2012 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques.

              Sixty extracted human teeth were divided into three groups of 20 each. Apically extruded debris and irrigant were collected, dried, and weighed by the following three instrumentation techniques: (a) group 1, filing 1 mm short of the foramen; (b) group 2, Canal Master instrumentation to the foramen; and (c) group 3, filing to the foramen (for a relative comparison). The results indicated that all three groups were significantly different from one another. Group 1 had the least amount of debris extruded. Of the two groups instrumented to the foramen, group 3 had twice as much debris extruded as group 2. An apical dentinal plug was frequently found in group 1 and was probably a major reason why this group had the least amount of extruded debris. The significance of this dentinal plug and possible indications for instrumentation to the foramen are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Dent Sci
                J Dent Sci
                Journal of Dental Sciences
                Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
                1991-7902
                2213-8862
                18 April 2016
                June 2016
                18 April 2016
                : 11
                : 2
                : 136-140
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, IHBR, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
                [b ]Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University, Yangsan, South Korea
                [c ]Endodontic Unit, Dental Services, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
                [d ]Department of Oral Anatomy and Neurobiology, BK21, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Geumo-ro 20, Mulgeum, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, South Korea. golddent@ 123456pusan.ac.kr
                Article
                S1991-7902(16)30009-5
                10.1016/j.jds.2016.03.002
                6395285
                3b4c7ed2-c761-4ad1-a889-002017889328
                Copyright © 2016, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 2 February 2016
                : 4 March 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                debris extrusion,glide-path,nickel-titanium rotary file,one g,proglider,scoutrace

                Comments

                Comment on this article