12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Key components of post-diagnostic support for people with dementia and their carers: A qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There has been a shift in focus of international dementia policies from improving diagnostic rates to enhancing the post-diagnostic support provided to people with dementia and their carers. There is, however, little agreement over what constitutes good post-diagnostic support. This study aimed to identify the components of post-diagnostic dementia support.

          Methods

          We adopted a qualitative design using interviews, focus groups and observation to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders on the content of post-diagnostic dementia support. Purposive sampling was used to identify sites in England and Wales recognised as delivering good practice. Participants included 17 people with dementia, 31 carers, 68 service managers or funders, and 78 frontline staff. Interviews and focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed for analysis. Forty-eight sessions of observation were completed and recorded in fieldnotes. Components were identified through an inductive, thematic approach and cross-checked against national guidelines and existing frameworks; they were subsequently critically reviewed by a range of experts and our mixed stakeholder panel.

          Results

          Twenty distinct components of post-diagnostic support were identified, related to five themes: timely identification and management of needs; understanding and managing dementia; emotional and psychological wellbeing; practical support; and integrating support. The first and last of these were cross-cutting themes facilitating the delivery of a unique constellation of components of post-diagnostic support to each individual living with dementia or dyad at a particular time.

          Conclusions

          Our work offers an empirically based framework to inform the development and delivery of holistic, integrated and continuous dementia care from diagnosis to end of life. It highlights the relevance of many components to both people living with dementia and their carers. Since the framework was developed in England and Wales, further research is needed to explore the relevance of our components to other sectors, countries and care systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.

            Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of COVID-19 related social support service closures on people with dementia and unpaid carers: a qualitative study

              Accessing social care and social support services is key to support the well-being of people living with dementia (PLWD) and unpaid carers. COVID-19 has caused sudden closures or radical modifications of these services, and is resulting in prolonged self-isolation. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of COVID-19 related social care and support service changes and closures on the lives of PLWD and unpaid carers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                20 December 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 12
                : e0260506
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [2 ] South Cloisters, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Office of Vice Chancellor, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
                [4 ] Dementia UK, London, United Kingdom
                [5 ] NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, The Policy Institute at King’s, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
                Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ¶ Membership of the PriDem study team is provided in the Acknowledgments.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2885-801X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-0286
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-4901
                Article
                PONE-D-21-24598
                10.1371/journal.pone.0260506
                8687564
                34928972
                3d13ab8b-dace-41e6-af95-36bd9033d77c
                © 2021 Bamford et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 July 2021
                : 10 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 7, Pages: 23
                Funding
                Funded by: NIHR Senior Investigator award
                Award ID: NF-SI-0616-10054
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Society
                Award ID: 331
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Society
                Award ID: 331
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Society
                Award ID: 331
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: North East Commissioning Service NIHR Research Capacity Funding
                Award ID: PO826023145
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: North East Commissioning Service NIHR Research Capacity Funding
                Award ID: PO826023145
                Award Recipient :
                This work was primarily funded by the Alzheimer's Society, grant number 331 with small amounts of additional funding from an NIHR Senior Investigator award held by Louise Robinson, grant number NF-SI-0616-10054, and a grant from North East Commissioning Service NIHR Research Capacity Funding, grant number PO826023145.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Dementia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Dementia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Dementia
                Alzheimer's Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Dementia
                Alzheimer's Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Neurodegenerative Diseases
                Alzheimer's Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Neurodegenerative Diseases
                Alzheimer's Disease
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Nurses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Nurses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Primary Care
                Medicine and health sciences
                Mental health and psychiatry
                Dementia
                Dementia with Lewy bodies
                Medicine and health sciences
                Neurology
                Dementia
                Dementia with Lewy bodies
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Dementia
                Frontotemporal Dementia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Dementia
                Frontotemporal Dementia
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Qualitative Studies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Clinical Psychology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Clinical Psychology
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Clinical Psychology
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data have been uploaded to a public repository: https://doi.org/10.25405/data.ncl.c.5718116.v1.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article