1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictors of long-term symptom burden and quality of life in patients hospitalised with chest pain: a prospective observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To describe the magnitude and predictors of symptom burden (SB) and quality of life (QoL) 3 months after hospital admission for acute chest pain.

          Design

          Prospective observational study.

          Setting

          Single centre, outpatient follow-up.

          Participants

          1506 patients.

          Outcomes

          Scores reported for general health (RAND-12), angina-related health (Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 (SAQ-7)) and dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale) 3 months after hospital admission for chest pain.

          Methods

          A total of 1506 patients received questionnaires assessing general health (RAND-12), angina-related health (SAQ-7) and dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale) 3 months after discharge. Univariable and multivariable regression models identified predictors of SB and QoL scores. A mediator analysis identified factors mediating the effect of an unstable angina pectoris (UAP) diagnosis.

          Results

          774 (52%) responded. Discharge diagnoses were non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (14.2%), UAP (17.1%), non-coronary cardiac disease (6.6%), non-cardiac disease (6.3%) and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) (55.6%). NSTEMI had the most favourable, and UAP patients the least favourable SAQ-7 scores (median SAQ7-summary; 88 vs 75, p<0.001). NCCP patients reported persisting chest pain in 50% and dyspnoea in 33% of cases. After adjusting for confounders, revascularisation predicted better QoL scores, while UAP, current smoking and hypertension predicted worse outcome. NSTEMI and UAP patients who were revascularised reported higher scores (p<0.05) in SAQ-7-QL, SAQ7-PL, SAQ7-summary (NSTEMI) and all SAQ-7 domains (UAP). Revascularisation altered the unstandardised beta value (>±10%) of an UAP diagnosis for all SAQ-7 and RAND-12 outcomes.

          Conclusions

          Patients with NSTEMI reported the most favourable outcome 3 months after hospitalisation for chest pain. Patients with other diseases, in particular UAP patients, reported lower scores. Revascularised NSTEMI and UAP patients reported higher QoL scores compared with patients receiving conservative treatment. Revascularisation mediated all outcomes in UAP patients.

          Trial registration number

          NCT02620202.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

          Regression methods were used to select and score 12 items from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) to reproduce the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scales in the general US population (n=2,333). The resulting 12-item short-form (SF-12) achieved multiple R squares of 0.911 and 0.918 in predictions of the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and SF-36 Mental Component Summary scores, respectively. Scoring algorithms from the general population used to score 12-item versions of the two components (Physical Components Summary and Mental Component Summary) achieved R squares of 0.905 with the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and 0.938 with SF-36 Mental Component Summary when cross-validated in the Medical Outcomes Study. Test-retest (2-week)correlations of 0.89 and 0.76 were observed for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the 12-item Mental Component Summary, respectively, in the general US population (n=232). Twenty cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of empirical validity previously published for the 36-item short-form scales and summary measures were replicated for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the 12-item Mental Component Summary, including comparisons between patient groups known to differ or to change in terms of the presence and seriousness of physical and mental conditions, acute symptoms, age and aging, self-reported 1-year changes in health, and recovery for depression. In 14 validity tests involving physical criteria, relative validity estimates for the 12-item Physical Component Summary ranged from 0.43 to 0.93 (median=0.67) in comparison with the best 36-item short-form scale. Relative validity estimates for the 12-item Mental Component Summary in 6 tests involving mental criteria ranged from 0.60 to 107 (median=0.97) in relation to the best 36-item short-form scale. Average scores for the 2 summary measures, and those for most scales in the 8-scale profile based on the 12-item short-form, closely mirrored those for the 36-item short-form, although standard errors were nearly always larger for the 12-item short-form.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            OUP accepted manuscript

            (2020)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                13 July 2022
                : 12
                : 7
                : e062302
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical Science , University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Heart Disease , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen, Norway
                [3 ]departmentEmergency Care Clinic , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen, Norway
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical Medicine , University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
                [5 ]departmentLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry , Stavanger University Hospital , Stavanger, Norway
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Cardiology , Stavanger University Hospital , Stavanger, Norway
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Medicine , Stavanger University Hospital , Stavanger, Norway
                [8 ]departmentInstitute for Clinical Medicine , University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
                [9 ]departmentDepartment of Cardiology , Akershus University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
                [10 ]departmentDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen, Norway
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Kristin Moberg Aakre; kristin.moberg.aakre@ 123456helse-bergen.no
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-2119
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-9436
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7340-6736
                Article
                bmjopen-2022-062302
                10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062302
                9280876
                35831040
                3d3a5249-fc2e-4ff5-8be2-791331515d4a
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 February 2022
                : 30 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Regional Health Authority;
                Award ID: 912208
                Award ID: 912265
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                1506
                1683
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                myocardial infarction,adult cardiology,coronary heart disease,coronary intervention,quality in health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article