10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw in Traumatic Spinal Surgery

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In cases of unstable cervical traumatic lesions, the biomechanical superiority of the cervical pedicle screw (CPS) allows the lesion to be stabilized effectively. In this study, we review and summarize the indications, technical guidelines, and potential neurovascular complications and their prevention of the use of the CPS for trauma. For patients with fractured lamina or lateral mass, a CPS is reliable for stabilization. In addition, the CPS can penetrate through a linear cervical spinal pedicle fracture gap and could stabilize three-column injury. CPS reduce the range of surgical approach and preserve the motion segment using short-segment fixation. Fluoroscopy-guided CPS insertion is popular and cost-effective. Image-guided navigation systems improve accuracy. Three-dimensional template-guided CPS placement is simple to use. Most spine surgeons can perform laminoforaminotomy easily. Freehand technique that can be performed quickly without heavy equipment is suitable for emergency situation. Possible complications due to screw misplacement are vertebral artery injury owing to a laterally misplaced screw, dural sac or spinal cord injury from a medially misplaced screw, and nerve root injury caused by a superiorly or inferiorly misplaced screw. To prevent neurovascular complications, meticulous preoperative anatomical evaluation and following the five steps are most important.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transpedicular screw fixation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: description of the techniques and preliminary report.

          Thirteen patients with fractures and/or dislocations of the middle and lower cervical spine were treated by transpedicular screw fixation using the Steffee variable screw placement system. Postoperative immobilization was either not used or simplified to short-term use of a soft neck collar. Recovery of nerve function and correction of kyphotic and/or translational deformities were satisfactory. All patients had solid fusion without loss of correction at the latest follow-up. There were no neurovascular complications. It was concluded that transpedicular screw fixation is as strong a fixation procedure for the cervical spine as it is for the thoracic and lumbar spine. This surgical procedure is associated with some risks of major neurovascular injuries; however, safety is adequate if the procedure is performed by experienced surgeons using meticulous surgical techniques.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.

            Although successful clinical use of cervical pedicle screws has been reported, anatomical studies have shown the possibility for serious iatrogenic injury. However, there are only a limited number of reports on the biomechanical properties of these screws which evaluate the potential benefits of their application. To investigate if the pull-out strengths after cyclic uniplanar loading of cervical pedicle screws are superior to lateral mass screws. An in vitro biomechanical study. Twenty fresh-frozen disarticulated human vertebrae (C3-C7) were randomized to receive both a 3.5 mm cervical pedicle screw and lateral mass screw. The screws were cyclically loaded 200 times in the sagittal plane. The amount of displacement was recorded every 50 cycles. After cyclical loading, the screws were pulled and tensile load to failure was recorded. Bone density was measured in each specimen and maximum screw insertion torque was recorded for each screw. During loading the two screw types showed similar stability initially, however the lateral mass screws rapidly loosened compared to the pedicle screws. The rate of loosening in the lateral mass screws was widely variable, while the performance of the pedicle screws was very consistent. The pullout strengths were significantly higher for the cervical pedicle screws (1214 N vs. 332 N) and 40% failed by fracture of the pedicle rather than screw pullout. Pedicle screw pullout strengths correlated with both screw insertion torque and specimen bone density. Cervical pedicle screws demonstrated a significantly lower rate of loosening at the bone-screw interface, as well as higher strength after fatigue testing. These biomechanical strengths may justify their use in certain limited clinical applications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope.

              Cervical pedicle screw fixation is an effective procedure for stabilising an unstable motion segment; however, it has generally been considered too risky due to the potential for injury to neurovascular structures, such as the spinal cord, nerve roots or vertebral arteries. Since 1995, we have treated 144 unstable cervical injury patients with pedicle screws using a fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle axis view technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of this technique in accurately placing pedicle screws to treat unstable cervical injuries, and the ensuing clinical outcomes and complications. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was postoperatively examined by axial computed tomography scans and oblique radiographs. Solid posterior bony fusion without secondary dislodgement was accomplished in 96% of all cases. Of the 620 cervical pedicle screws inserted, 57 (9.2%) demonstrated screw exposure ( 50% of the screw outside the pedicle). There was one case in which a probe penetrated a vertebral artery without further complication and one case with transient radiculopathy. Pre- and postoperative tracheotomy was required in 20 (13.9%) of the 144 patients. However, the tracheotomies were easily performed, because those patients underwent posterior surgery alone without postoperative external fixation. The placement of cervical pedicle screws using a fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle axis view technique provided good clinical results and a few complications for unstable cervical injuries, but a careful surgical procedure was needed to safely insert the screws and more improvement in imaging and navigation system is expected.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Neurotrauma
                Korean J Neurotrauma
                KJN
                Korean Journal of Neurotrauma
                Korean Neurotraumatology Society
                2234-8999
                2288-2243
                April 2020
                24 April 2020
                : 16
                : 1
                : 18-27
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Jin Hoon Park. Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea. jhpark@ 123456amc.seoul.kr
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-9857
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-8137
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-1210
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5211-6676
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0903-3146
                Article
                10.13004/kjnt.2020.16.e13
                7192805
                32395448
                3d50d22c-3281-4b9a-97b8-f5e71242959a
                Copyright © 2020 Korean Neurotraumatology Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 March 2020
                : 13 April 2020
                Categories
                Review Article

                cervical pedicle screw,technique,complication,navigation,trauma,accuracy

                Comments

                Comment on this article