89
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    19
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mode of allocation and social demographic factors correlate with impaired quality of life after liver transplantation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) is a major goal of clinical management after liver transplantation (LTx). There is still disagreement on the effects of social-demographic factors and changes in the allocation system on HRQoL. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of social-demographic factors, mode of organ-allocation, waiting time and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on HRQoL after LTx.

          Methods

          HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire, which was sent to 238 recipients. Investigated parameters included age, sex, distance to transplant center, follow-up at hospital, size of hometown, highest education, marital status, having children, background liver disease, waiting time, mode of allocation, HCC, hospitalization after LTx and diagnosis of malignancy after LTx. All evaluated parameters were entered into multivariate linear regression analysis.

          Results

          Completed questionnaire were returned by 73 % of the recipients. After LTx, the HRQoL-function scales increased over time. Age, marital status, highest education, completed professional training, working status, job position, duration of waiting time to LTx, distance to transplant center, place offollow, HU-statuts, mode of organ allocation and duration of hospitalization were associated with significantly worse function- and significantly lower symptom scales. HCC as a primary disease did not affect HRQoL.

          Conclusions

          Low HRQoL correlated significantly with MELD-based organ allocation, more than 28-day hospitalization, divorced status, lower education- and non-working status, higher distance to transplant center, follow up at transplant center, HU-status, shorter waiting time to LTx and younger age. Improvement of HRQoL after LTx may require clinical management of pain, psychotherapy and financial support.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          HOMOTRANSPLANTATION OF THE LIVER IN HUMANS.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            MELD fails to measure quality of life in liver transplant candidates.

            Previous studies have demonstrated an association between Child Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class and impaired quality of life. However, the relationship between the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and quality of life (QOL) has not been well studied. In this study, quality of life questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 [SF-36] and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire [CLDQ]) were administered to 150 adult patients awaiting liver transplantation. We also collected demographic data and laboratory results and recorded manifestations of hepatic decompensation. The study found that all domains of the SF-36 and CLDQ were significantly lower in our patient cohort than in normal controls (P < .001). There was a moderate negative correlation between CPT class and physical components of the SF-36 (r = -.30), while there was a weak negative correlation (r = -.10) between CPT class and the mental component. There was a negative moderate correlation between CPT class and overall CLDQ (r = -.39, P < .001) and a weak correlation (r = -.20) between MELD score and overall CLDQ score. Both encephalopathy (correlation coefficient = -.713, P = .004) and ascites (correlation coefficient = -.68, P = .006) were predictive of the QOL using CLDQ (adjusted R(2) = .1494 and f = 0.000). In conclusion, in liver transplant candidates, the severity of liver disease assessed by the MELD score was not predictive of QOL. The presence of ascites and/or encephalopathy was significantly associated with poor quality of life. CTP correlates better to QOL, probably because it contains ascites and encephalopathy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of life up to 30 years following liver transplantation.

              Liver transplantation provides a return to a satisfactory quality of life (QOL) for the majority of patients in the short to medium term (first 5 years), but there is very little information on the QOL in the longer term and the factors influencing it. We therefore undertook a single-center cross-sectional analysis to determine QOL in patients 10 or more years after liver transplantation. All liver transplant recipients who were followed up at the Cambridge Transplant Unit for 10 or more years (transplanted between 1968 and 1994) and resident in the United Kingdom were asked to complete by post the Short Form 36 version 2 and the Ferrans and Powers questionnaires to evaluate their QOL. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between a range of clinical parameters and QOL. One hundred two patients were invited to participate, and 61 (59.8%) responded. Overall, the patients reported a satisfactory QOL. On the Ferrans and Powers questionnaire, the patients had a mean Quality of Life Index score of 24.5. Factors associated with reduced physical functioning were age > 50 years at transplantation, female gender, and recurrence of the primary liver disease. On the Short Form 36 version 2 questionnaire, recipients had reduced physical functioning but normal mental health parameters in comparison with the normal population. Age > 60 years at the time of survey, female gender, and posttransplant complications were associated with reduced physical functioning. In conclusion, patients 10 or more years after liver transplantation generally have a good QOL, although physical functioning is reduced. Addressing issues such as recurrent disease and posttransplant problems such as osteoporosis may help to improve long-term QOL. (c) 2008 AASLD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nils.heits@uksh-kiel.de
                gunnarmeer@hotmail.com
                Alexander.Bernsmeier@uksh.de
                rguenther@1med.uni-kiel.de
                Bjoern.malchow@uksh-kiel.de
                th.kuechler@t-online.de
                thomas.becker@uksh-kiel.de
                Felix.Braun@uksh-kiel.de
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                30 September 2015
                30 September 2015
                2015
                : 13
                : 162
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of General, Visceral-, Thoracic-, Transplantation- and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3 (Haus 18), 24105 Kiel, Germany
                [ ]Institute of Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3 (Haus 18), 24105 Kiel, Germany
                [ ]Reference Center for Quality of Life, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Strasse 3 (Haus 18), 24105 Kiel, Germany
                Article
                360
                10.1186/s12955-015-0360-z
                4588670
                26420554
                3d8a60a8-4b0e-487e-a9a3-e9d59dc383dd
                © Heits et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 8 May 2015
                : 22 September 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Health & Social care
                liver transplantation,quality of life,allocation-system,social demographic factors,age,sex,hcc,waiting time

                Comments

                Comment on this article