For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
Inviting an author to review:
Effects of strain and serotonergic agents on prepulse inhibition and habituation in mice
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
39
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      229
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phenomenology, Saudi Arabia, and an argument for the standardization of clinical ethics consultation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of this study is to make a philosophical argument against the phenomenological critique of standardization in clinical ethics. We used the context of clinical ethics in Saudi Arabia to demonstrate the importance of credentialing clinical ethicists.

          Methods

          Philosophical methods of argumentation and conceptual analysis were used.

          Results

          We found the phenomenological critique of standardization to be flawed because it relies on a series of false dichotomies.

          Conclusions

          We concluded that the phenomenological framing of the credentialing debate relies upon two extreme views to be navigated between, not chosen among, in the credentialing of clinical ethicists.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Enough: The Failure of the Living Will

          Angela Fagerlin, Carl Schneider (2004)
          Article 0 comments Cited 72 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transgender Children and the Right to Transition: Medical Ethics When Parents Mean Well but Cause Harm

            Maura Priest (2019)
            Article 0 comments Cited 27 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice.

              G Derenzo, Peter J. Schwartz, J. Berger (2008)
              The care of adult patients without decision-making abilities is a routine part of medical practice. Decisions for these patients are typically made by surrogates according to a process governed by a hierarchy of 3 distinct decision-making standards: patients' known wishes, substituted judgments, and best interests. Although this framework offers some guidance, it does not readily incorporate many important considerations of patients and families and does not account for the ways in which many patients and surrogates prefer to make decisions. In this article, the authors review the research on surrogate decision making, compare it with normative standards, and offer ways in which the 2 can be reconciled for the patient's benefit.
              Article 0 comments Cited 22 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Abram Brummett:
                ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-574X
                abrummett@oakland.edu
                Ruaim Muaygil: rmuaygil@ksu.edu.sa
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Philos Ethics Humanit Med
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Philos Ethics Humanit Med
                Title: Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM
                Publisher: BioMed Central (London )
                ISSN (Electronic): 1747-5341
                Publication date (Electronic): 12 March 2021
                Publication date PMC-release: 12 March 2021
                Publication date Collection: 2021
                Volume: 16
                Electronic Location Identifier: 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.261277.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2219 916X, Department of Foundational Medical Studies, , Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, ; 3331 Squirrel Court, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.56302.32, ISNI 0000 0004 1773 5396, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, ; 6877 Ibrahim Ibn Hadi, Riyadh, 12476 Saudi Arabia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-574X
                Article
                Publisher ID: 99
                DOI: 10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6
                PMC ID: 7953697
                PubMed ID: 33706761
                SO-VID: 3db0ce71-21dd-47e6-805f-2776b7d89462
                Copyright © © The Author(s) 2021
                License:

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                Date received : 27 April 2020
                Date accepted : 18 February 2021
                Categories
                Subject: Research
                Custom metadata
                issue-copyright-statement © The Author(s) 2021

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Philosophy of science
                Keywords: clinical ethics consultation,saudi arabia,phenomenology,credentialing
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Philosophy of science
                Keywords: clinical ethics consultation, saudi arabia, phenomenology, credentialing

                Comments

                Comment on this article