4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Identification of pathogenic mutations from nonobstructive azoospermia patients

      , , , , ,
      Biology of Reproduction
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is estimated that approximately 25% of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) cases are caused by single genetic anomalies, including chromosomal aberrations and gene mutations. The identification of these mutations in NOA patients has always been a research hot spot in the area of human infertility. However, compared with more than 600 genes reported to be essential for fertility in mice, mutations in approximately 75 genes have been confirmed to be pathogenic in patients with male infertility, in which only 14 were identified from NOA patients. The small proportion suggested that there is much room to improve the methodology of mutation screening and functional verification. Fortunately, recent advances in whole exome sequencing and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)–Cas9 have greatly promoted research on the etiology of human infertility and made improvements possible. In this review, we have summarized the pathogenic mutations found in NOA patients and the efforts we have made to improve the efficiency of mutation screening from NOA patients and functional verification with the application of new technologies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biology of Reproduction
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0006-3363
          1529-7268
          July 2022
          July 25 2022
          May 09 2022
          July 2022
          July 25 2022
          May 09 2022
          : 107
          : 1
          : 85-94
          Article
          10.1093/biolre/ioac089
          35532179
          3e086663-463a-46dd-8414-5fe7fc07af2d
          © 2022

          https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article