10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Computed tomography scans of intra-abdominal fat, anthropometric measurements, and 3 nonobese metabolic risk factors.

      Metabolism
      Abdominal Fat, radiography, Adult, Anthropometry, Blood Glucose, metabolism, Blood Pressure, physiology, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Denmark, epidemiology, Female, Fibrinogen, Humans, Male, Metabolic Syndrome X, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1, blood, ROC Curve, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Triglycerides, Waist-Hip Ratio

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present cross-sectional study of 46 adult Danish white men and women aimed to evaluate association between intra-abdominal obesity, 4 anthropometric measurements of obesity, and combinations of 3 nonobese metabolic risk factors: systolic blood pressure of 130 mm Hg or higher, serum triglyceride concentration of more than 1.7 mmol/L, and fasting capillary blood glucose concentration of 5.6 mmol/L or more. For 80% of the subjects, intra-abdominal fat on a computed tomography scan of the abdomen using a cutoff limit of more than 144 cm(2) gave a correct classification of combinations of at least 2 of the 3 metabolic risk factors. Body mass index and waist circumference were better markers of intra-abdominal obesity than waist-to-hip ratio in receiver operating characteristic analyses (P = .0035). Body mass index of more than 26 kg/m(2) and waist circumference of more than 0.92 m classified 76% and 74% of the subjects correctly regarding combinations of the 3 nonobese metabolic risk factors. Intra-abdominal obesity was significantly stronger associated with the combinations than a raised waist-to-hip ratio (P = .016). Both body mass index and waist circumference may be used as markers of intra-abdominal obesity, whereas waist-to-hip ratio was significantly inferior. Correspondingly, both body mass index and waist circumference were better than waist-to-hip ratio to indicate combinations of the 3 nonobese metabolic risk factors.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article