Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefazolin in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Critically Ill Patients

Abstract

Background

The relative distribution of cefazolin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) remains debated. Determining the distribution of cefazolin into the CSF in noninfected adults may allow for further treatment applications of cefazolin. This prospective pharmacokinetic study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefazolin in serum and CSF from external ventricular drains (EVDs) in neurologically injured adults.

Methods

Blood and CSF were collected, using a biologic waste protocol, for cefazolin quantification and trapezoidal rule–based pharmacokinetic analysis in a total of 15 critically ill adults receiving 2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours or the renal dose equivalent for EVD prophylaxis.

Results

A median (range) of 3 (2–4) blood and 3 (2–5) CSF samples were collected for each patient. The most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (66.7%). The median calculated cefazolin CSF C _max and C _min values (interquartile range [IQR]) were 2.97 (1.76–8.56) mg/L and 1.59 (0.77–2.17) mg/L, respectively. The median (IQR) CSF to serum area under the curve ratio was 6.7% (3.7%–10.6%), with time-matched estimates providing a similar estimate (8.4%). Of those receiving cefazolin every 8 hours, the median and minimum directly measured CSF cefazolin concentration ≥4 hours following administration were 1.87 and 0.78 mg/L, respectively.

Conclusions

Cefazolin dosed for EVD prophylaxis achieved CSF concentrations suggesting viability as a therapeutic option for patients with meningitis or ventriculitis due to susceptible bacteria such as methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Further clinical trials are required to confirm a role in therapy for cefazolin. Population-based pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling may suggest an optimal cefazolin regimen for the treatment of central nervous system infections.

Abstract

D/C/F/TAF is the reference for combination therapy based on protease inhibitors but has not been compared with regimens containing integrase inhibitors as initial ART. We could not demonstrate D/C/F/TAF noninferiority relative to DTG/ABC/3TC, although both regimens were similarly well tolerated.