25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impaired M 3 and enhanced M 2 muscarinic receptor contractile function in a streptozotocin model of mouse diabetic urinary bladder

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated the contractile roles of M 2 and M 3 muscarinic receptors in urinary bladder from streptozotocin-treated mice. Wild-type and M 2 muscarinic receptor knockout (M 2 KO) mice were given a single injection of vehicle or streptozotocin (125 mg kg −1) 2–24 weeks prior to bladder assays. The effect of forskolin on contractions elicited to the muscarinic agonist, oxotremorine-M, was measured in isolated urinary bladder (intact or denuded of urothelium). Denuded urinary bladder from vehicle-treated wild-type and M 2 KO mice exhibited similar contractile responses to oxotremorine-M, when contraction was normalized relative to that elicited by KCl (50 mM). Eight to 9 weeks after streptozotocin treatment, the EC 50 value of oxotremorine-M increased 3.1-fold in urinary bladder from the M 2 KO mouse ( N = 5) compared to wild type ( N = 6; P < 0.001). Analogous changes were observed in intact bladder. In denuded urinary bladder from vehicle-treated mice, forskolin (5 µM) caused a much greater inhibition of contraction in M 2 KO bladder compared to wild type. Following streptozotocin treatment, this forskolin effect increased 1.6-fold ( P = 0.032). At the 20- to 24-week time point, the forskolin effect increased 1.7-fold for denuded as well as intact bladders ( P = 0.036, 0.01, respectively). Although streptozotocin treatment inhibits M 3 receptor-mediated contraction in denuded urinary bladder, muscarinic contractile function is maintained in wild-type bladder by enhanced M 2 contractile function. M 2 receptor activation opposes forskolin-induced relaxation of the urinary bladder, and this M 2 function is enhanced following streptozotocin treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Nephropathy in diabetes.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Operational models of pharmacological agonism.

            The traditional receptor-stimulus model of agonism began with a description of drug action based on the law of mass action and has developed by a series of modifications, each accounting for new experimental evidence. By contrast, in this paper an approach to modelling agonism is taken that begins with the observation that experimental agonist-concentration effect, E/[A], curves are commonly hyperbolic and develops using the deduction that the relation between occupancy and effect must be hyperbolic if the law of mass action applies at the agonist-receptor level. The result is a general model that explicitly describes agonism by three parameters: an agonist-receptor dissociation constant, KA; the total receptor concentration, [R0]; and a parameter, KE, defining the transduction of agonist-receptor complex, AR, into pharmacological effect. The ratio, [R0]/KE, described here as the 'transducer ratio', tau, is a logical definition for the efficacy of an agonist in a system. The model may be extended to account for non-hyperbolic E/[A] curves with no loss of meaning. Analysis shows that an explicit formulation of the traditional receptor-stimulus model is one particular form of the general model but that it is not the simplest. An alternative model is proposed, representing the cognitive and transducer functions of a receptor, that describes agonist action with one fewer parameter than the traditional model. In addition, this model provides a chemical definition of intrinsic efficacy making this parameter experimentally accessible in principle. The alternative models are compared and contrasted with regard to their practical and conceptual utilities in experimental pharmacology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms of action of transmitters and other substances on smooth muscle.

              T Bolton (1979)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1-949-8246208 , +1-949-8244855 , fjehlert@uci.edu
                Journal
                Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
                Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0028-1298
                1432-1912
                27 March 2010
                27 March 2010
                May 2010
                : 381
                : 5
                : 441-454
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4625 USA
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Research and General Medicine, Tokyo-Nishi Tokushukai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                Article
                509
                10.1007/s00210-010-0509-6
                2862252
                20349044
                3f0240d2-56d4-43ec-89d1-f63786136690
                © The Author(s) 2010
                History
                : 8 December 2009
                : 25 February 2010
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2010

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                urinary bladder,smooth muscle,m2 muscarinic receptor,contraction,streptozotocin,diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article