3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Valor de corte del índice de conicidad como predictor independiente de disglucemias Translated title: Cut-off value of the conicity index as an independent predictor of dysglycemia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Introducción: En Cuba no existe consenso acerca del valor del índice de conicidad que debe ser considerado de riesgo para identificar disglucemias. Objetivos: Determinar el punto de corte del índice de conicidad como predictor de disglucemia en ambos sexos. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal con 975 personas (523 mujeres y 452 hombres), que asistieron a consulta externa del Instituto Nacional de Endocrinología por sospecha de diabetes mellitus entre abril de 2008 y abril de 2013. Se les realizó interrogatorio, examen físico y estudios complementarios (prueba de tolerancia oral a la glucosa, insulinemia en ayunas, lípidos y ácido úrico). Se utilizó para el procesamiento estadístico el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson, análisis de regresión logística y el análisis de curvas Receiver Operator Characteristic. Resultados: En el sexo femenino se observó una correlación directamente proporcional y significativa entre el índice de conicidad y las variables glucemia en ayunas y a las 2 h, insulinemia en ayunas, colesterol, triglicéridos, ácido úrico y el índice “homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance”. En el sexo masculino se observó una correlacióndirectamente proporcional y significativa entre el índice de conicidad y las variables estudiadas, excepto con los triglicéridos. El índice de conicidad tuvo su mayor poder predictor de disglucemia con un punto de corte de 1,18 para las mujeres y 1,20 en hombres. Conclusiones: El punto de corte óptimo del índice de conicidad como predictor de disglucemia fue de 1,18 para las mujeres y 1,20 para los hombres; es decir que tuvo un buen poder predictivo de disglucemias en el sexo femenino, no así en el masculino.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Introduction: In Cuba, there is no consensus about the value of the conicity index that should be considered as risk to identify dysglycemia. Objective: To determine the cut-off point of conicity index as a predictor of dysglycemia in both sexes. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 975 people (523 women and 452 men), who attended an outpatient consultation at the National Endocrinology Institute for suspected diabetes mellitus from April 2008 to April 2013. Interrogation, physical examination and complementary studies (oral glucose tolerance test, fasting insulinemia, lipids and uric acid) were performed. Pearson's correlation coefficient, logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis were used for statistical processing. Results: In the female subjects, a directly proportional and significant correlation was observed between the conicity index and the fasting blood glucose variables and at 2 h, fasting insulinemia, cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid and the index homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. In the male subjects, a directly proportional and significant correlation was observed between the conicity index and the variables studied, except with triglycerides. The conicity index had its highest predictive power of dysglycemia with a cut-off point of 1.18 in women and 1.20 in men. Conclusions: The optimal cut-off point of conicity index as a predictor of dysglycemia was 1.18 for women and 1.20 for men; that is to say, it was a good predictor of dysglycemias in the female subjects, but not so for male subjects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

          In 2010, overweight and obesity were estimated to cause 3·4 million deaths, 3·9% of years of life lost, and 3·8% of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) worldwide. The rise in obesity has led to widespread calls for regular monitoring of changes in overweight and obesity prevalence in all populations. Comparable, up-to-date information about levels and trends is essential to quantify population health effects and to prompt decision makers to prioritise action. We estimate the global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013. We systematically identified surveys, reports, and published studies (n=1769) that included data for height and weight, both through physical measurements and self-reports. We used mixed effects linear regression to correct for bias in self-reports. We obtained data for prevalence of obesity and overweight by age, sex, country, and year (n=19,244) with a spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression model to estimate prevalence with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). Worldwide, the proportion of adults with a body-mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m(2) or greater increased between 1980 and 2013 from 28·8% (95% UI 28·4-29·3) to 36·9% (36·3-37·4) in men, and from 29·8% (29·3-30·2) to 38·0% (37·5-38·5) in women. Prevalence has increased substantially in children and adolescents in developed countries; 23·8% (22·9-24·7) of boys and 22·6% (21·7-23·6) of girls were overweight or obese in 2013. The prevalence of overweight and obesity has also increased in children and adolescents in developing countries, from 8·1% (7·7-8·6) to 12·9% (12·3-13·5) in 2013 for boys and from 8·4% (8·1-8·8) to 13·4% (13·0-13·9) in girls. In adults, estimated prevalence of obesity exceeded 50% in men in Tonga and in women in Kuwait, Kiribati, Federated States of Micronesia, Libya, Qatar, Tonga, and Samoa. Since 2006, the increase in adult obesity in developed countries has slowed down. Because of the established health risks and substantial increases in prevalence, obesity has become a major global health challenge. Not only is obesity increasing, but no national success stories have been reported in the past 33 years. Urgent global action and leadership is needed to help countries to more effectively intervene. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A simple model-based index of abdominal adiposity

            R. Valdez (1991)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comparison of anthropometric indices for predicting the risk of metabolic syndrome and its components in Chinese adults: a prospective, longitudinal study

              Objectives Our study aimed to distinguish the ability of anthropometric indices to assess the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Shenyang, China. Participants A total of 379 residents aged between 40 and 65 were enrolled. 253 of them were free of MetS and had been followed up for 4.5 years. Methods At baseline, all the participants underwent a thorough medical examination. A variety of anthropometric parameters were measured and calculated, including waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), a body shape index (ABSI), abdominal volume index (AVI), body adiposity index, body roundness index, conicity index, waist-to-hip ratio and visceral adiposity index (VAI). After 4.5 year follow-up, we re-examined whether participants were suffering from MetS. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to examine the potential of the above indices to identify the status and risk of MetS. Outcomes Occurrence of MetS. Results At baseline, 33.2% participants suffered from MetS. All of the anthropometric indices showed clinical significance, and VAI was superior to the other indices as it was found to have the largest area under the ROC curve. After a 4.5 year follow-up, 37.8% of men and 23.9% of women developed MetS. ROC curve analysis suggested that baseline BMI was the strongest predictor of MetS for men (0.77 (0.68–0.85)), and AVI was the strongest for women (0.72 (0.64–0.79)). However, no significant difference was observed between WC and both indices. In contrast, the baseline ABSI did not predict MetS in both genders. Conclusions The present study indicated that these different indices derived from anthropometric parameters have different discriminatory abilities for MetS. Although WC did not have the largest area under the ROC curve for diagnosing and predicting MetS, it may remain a better index of MetS status and risk because of its simplicity and wide use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                end
                Revista Cubana de Endocrinología
                Rev Cubana Endocrinol
                Editorial Ciencias Médicas (Ciudad de la Habana, , Cuba )
                1561-2953
                August 2019
                : 30
                : 2
                : e171
                Affiliations
                [1] La Habana La Habana orgnameUniversidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana orgdiv1Instituto Nacional de Endocrinología Cuba
                Article
                S1561-29532019000200005 S1561-2953(19)03000200005
                3f1df4ca-c9af-49e4-b394-1fe68e3d8652

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 12 April 2019
                : 20 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 51, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Cuba


                abdominal fat,conicity index,grasa abdominal,disglucemia,dysglycemia,obesidad,índice de conicidad,obesity

                Comments

                Comment on this article