20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of considering the brain as a biological organ that needs to be in the optimal condition to learn (‘brain health’); or indirectly, as neuroscience shapes psychological theory and psychology influences education. In this article, we trace the origins of educational neuroscience, its main areas of research activity and the principal challenges it faces as a translational field. We consider how a pure psychology approach that ignores neuroscience is at risk of being misleading for educators. We address the major criticisms of the field comprising, respectively, a priori arguments against the relevance of neuroscience to education, reservations with the current practical operation of the field, and doubts about the viability of neuroscience methods for diagnosing disorders or predicting individual differences. We consider future prospects of the field and ethical issues it raises. Finally, we discuss the challenge of responding to the (welcome) desire of education policymakers to include neuroscience evidence in their policymaking, while ensuring recommendations do not exceed the limitations of current basic science.

          Abstract

          Read the Commentary on this article at doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13030

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations.

          Explanations of psychological phenomena seem to generate more public interest when they contain neuroscientific information. Even irrelevant neuroscience information in an explanation of a psychological phenomenon may interfere with people's abilities to critically consider the underlying logic of this explanation. We tested this hypothesis by giving naïve adults, students in a neuroscience course, and neuroscience experts brief descriptions of psychological phenomena followed by one of four types of explanation, according to a 2 (good explanation vs. bad explanation) x 2 (without neuroscience vs. with neuroscience) design. Crucially, the neuroscience information was irrelevant to the logic of the explanation, as confirmed by the expert subjects. Subjects in all three groups judged good explanations as more satisfying than bad ones. But subjects in the two nonexpert groups additionally judged that explanations with logically irrelevant neuroscience information were more satisfying than explanations without. The neuroscience information had a particularly striking effect on nonexperts' judgments of bad explanations, masking otherwise salient problems in these explanations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills.

            The ubiquity of video games in today's society has led to significant interest in their impact on the brain and behavior and in the possibility of harnessing games for good. The present meta-analyses focus on one specific game genre that has been of particular interest to the scientific community-action video games, and cover the period 2000-2015. To assess the long-lasting impact of action video game play on various domains of cognition, we first consider cross-sectional studies that inform us about the cognitive profile of habitual action video game players, and document a positive average effect of about half a standard deviation (g = 0.55). We then turn to long-term intervention studies that inform us about the possibility of causally inducing changes in cognition via playing action video games, and show a smaller average effect of a third of a standard deviation (g = 0.34). Because only intervention studies using other commercially available video game genres as controls were included, this latter result highlights the fact that not all games equally impact cognition. Moderator analyses indicated that action video game play robustly enhances the domains of top-down attention and spatial cognition, with encouraging signs for perception. Publication bias remains, however, a threat with average effects in the published literature estimated to be 30% larger than in the full literature. As a result, we encourage the field to conduct larger cohort studies and more intervention studies, especially those with more than 30 hours of training. (PsycINFO Database Record
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Education for Growth: Why and for Whom?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.thomas@bbk.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Child Psychol Psychiatry
                J Child Psychol Psychiatry
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7610
                JCPP
                Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0021-9630
                1469-7610
                22 October 2018
                April 2019
                : 60
                : 4 , Annual Research Review: Developmental perspectives on child psychology and psychiatry ( doiID: 10.1111/jcpp.2019.60.issue-4 )
                : 477-492
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre for Educational Neuroscience Department of Psychological Science Birkbeck University of London London UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychology & Faculty of Education Western University London ON Canada
                [ 3 ] Department of Psychology University of York York UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Michael S. C. Thomas, Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Science, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 7HX, UK; Email: m.thomas@ 123456bbk.ac.uk

                Article
                JCPP12973
                10.1111/jcpp.12973
                6487963
                30345518
                3fa592c1-e750-4bef-8939-37cf7c00f4c7
                © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 16, Words: 14361
                Funding
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council
                Award ID: ES/N009924/1
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Award ID: WPEA_P67068
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council
                Award ID: ES/N009924/1
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Funded by: Jacobs Foundation
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Award ID: WPEA_P67068
                Funded by: Education Endowment Foundation
                Categories
                Annual Research Review
                Annual Research Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jcpp12973
                April 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:29.04.2019

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                educational neuroscience,translation,intervention,policy,neuromyths

                Comments

                Comment on this article