Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Moving apart together: co-movement of a symbiont community and their ant host, and its importance for community assembly

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Species interactions may affect spatial dynamics when the movement of one species is determined by the presence of another one. The most direct species-dependence of dispersal is vectored, usually cross-kingdom, movement of immobile parasites, diseases or seeds by mobile animals. Joint movements of species should, however, not be vectored by definition, as even mobile species are predicted to move together when they are tightly connected in symbiont communities.

          Methods

          We studied concerted movements in a diverse and heterogeneous community of arthropods (myrmecophiles) associated with red wood ants. We questioned whether joint-movement strategies eventually determine and speed-up community succession.

          Results

          We recorded an astonishingly high number of obligate myrmecophiles outside red wood ant nests. They preferentially co-moved with the host ants as the highest densities were found in locations with the highest density of foraging red wood ants, such as along the network of ant trails. These observations suggest that myrmecophiles resort to the host to move away from the nest, and this to a much higher extent than hitherto anticipated. Interestingly, functional groups of symbionts displayed different dispersal kernels, with predatory myrmecophiles moving more frequently and further from the nest than detritivorous myrmecophiles. We discovered that myrmecophile diversity was lower in newly founded nests than in mature red wood ant nests. Most myrmecophiles, however, were able to colonize new nests fast suggesting that the heterogeneity in mobility does not affect community assembly.

          Conclusions

          We show that co-movement is not restricted to tight parasitic, or cross-kingdom interactions. Movement in social insect symbiont communities may be heterogeneous and functional group-dependent, but clearly affected by host movement. Ultimately, this co-movement leads to directional movement and allows a fast colonisation of new patches, but not in a predictable way. This study highlights the importance of spatial dynamics of local and regional networks in symbiont metacommunities, of which those of symbionts of social insects are prime examples.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40462-021-00259-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers

            Many studies have shown how pigments and internal nanostructures generate color in nature. External surface structures can also influence appearance, such as by causing multiple scattering of light (structural absorption) to produce a velvety, super black appearance. Here we show that feathers from five species of birds of paradise (Aves: Paradisaeidae) structurally absorb incident light to produce extremely low-reflectance, super black plumages. Directional reflectance of these feathers (0.05–0.31%) approaches that of man-made ultra-absorbent materials. SEM, nano-CT, and ray-tracing simulations show that super black feathers have titled arrays of highly modified barbules, which cause more multiple scattering, resulting in more structural absorption, than normal black feathers. Super black feathers have an extreme directional reflectance bias and appear darkest when viewed from the distal direction. We hypothesize that structurally absorbing, super black plumage evolved through sensory bias to enhance the perceived brilliance of adjacent color patches during courtship display.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                thomas_parmentier@msn.com
                Journal
                Mov Ecol
                Mov Ecol
                Movement Ecology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2051-3933
                21 May 2021
                21 May 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5342.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2069 7798, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, , Ghent University, ; K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [2 ]GRID grid.6520.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2242 8479, Research Unit of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, , Namur Institute of Complex Systems, and Institute of Life, Earth, and the Environment, University of Namur, ; Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4082-0922
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-973X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-7505
                Article
                259
                10.1186/s40462-021-00259-5
                8140472
                34020716
                42618f8a-6401-4953-8c54-efb8fd9a7c6e
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 18 December 2020
                : 1 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003130, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek;
                Award ID: 1203020N
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002661, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS;
                Award ID: 30257865
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                ant guest,co-dispersal,community coexistence,host-parasite,inquiline,metacommunity,spatial structure,succession

                Comments

                Comment on this article