3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Let’s Give Together: Can Collaborative Giving Boost Generosity?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A growing number of people donate to charity together with others, such as a spouse, friend, or stranger. Does giving to charity collectively with another person—called collaborative giving—promote generosity? Existing data offer unsatisfactory insight; most studies are correlational, present mixed findings, or examine other concepts. Yet, theory suggests that collaborative giving may increase generosity because giving with others could be intrinsically enjoyable. We conducted two well-powered, pre-registered experiments to test whether collaborative giving boosts generosity. In Experiment 1 ( N = 202; 101 dyads) and Experiment 2 ( N = 310; 155 dyads), pairs of unacquainted undergraduates earned money and were randomly assigned to donate collaboratively (Experiments 1–2), individually in each other’s presence (Experiments 1–2), or privately (Experiment 2). Across studies, we observed no condition differences on generosity. However, collaborative (vs. individual) giving predicted greater intrinsic enjoyment, which, in turn, predicted larger donations, suggesting a promising potential mechanism for future research and practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

              In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists' nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how unacceptably easy it is to accumulate (and report) statistically significant evidence for a false hypothesis. Second, we suggest a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution to this problem. The solution involves six concrete requirements for authors and four guidelines for reviewers, all of which impose a minimal burden on the publication process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q
                Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q
                NVS
                spnvs
                Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0899-7640
                1552-7395
                12 February 2022
                February 2023
                : 52
                : 1
                : 50-74
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
                [2 ]New York University, Stern School of Business, New York City, New York, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Jason D. E. Proulx, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6. Email: jason_proulx@ 123456sfu.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-2368
                Article
                10.1177_08997640221074699
                10.1177/08997640221074699
                9829957
                436ad596-099d-404b-80c5-6d2efe119488
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000155;
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                generosity,charitable giving,collaboration,intrinsic motivation

                Comments

                Comment on this article