5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory with Coronary Artery Disease Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Fatigue is a common distressing symptom in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is used for measuring fatigue in various clinical settings. Nevertheless, its multidimensional structure has not been consistent across studies. Thus, we aimed to psychometrically evaluate the MFI in patients with CAD. Methods: In sum, 1162 CAD patients completed questionnaires assessing their subjective fatigue level (MFI-20), mental distress symptoms (HADS, STAI), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Participants also completed exercise capacity (EC) testing. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis of the four-factor model, showed acceptable fit (CFI = 0.905; GFI = 0.895; NFI = 0.893, RMSEA = 0.077). After eliminating four items, confirmatory factor analysis testing showed improvement in the four-factor model of the MFI-16 (CFI = 0.910; GFI = 0.909; NFI = 0.898, RMSEA = 0.077). Internal consistency values were adequate for the total score and four MFI-16 subscales: General fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, and mental fatigue with Cronbach’s α range: 0.60–0.82. The inadequate value (Cronbach’s α = 0.43) was received for the subscale of reduced motivation in both MFI-20 and MFI-16. Correlations between the MFI-16 and HADS, STAI, SF-36, and EC measures were statistically significant (all p’s < 0.001). Conclusions: The Lithuanian version of the modified MFI of 16 items showed good factorial structure and satisfactory psychometric characteristics, except for reduced motivation subscale.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

            A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

              Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                30 October 2020
                November 2020
                : 17
                : 21
                : 8003
                Affiliations
                Laboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania; adomas.bunevicius@ 123456lsmuni.lt (A.B.); julius.burkauskas@ 123456lsmuni.lt (J.B.); julijabrozaitiene@ 123456gmail.com (J.B.); julius.neverauskas@ 123456lsmuni.lt (J.N.); narseta.mickuviene@ 123456lsmuni.lt (N.M.); nijole.kazukauskiene@ 123456lsmuni.lt (N.K.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: julija.gecaite@ 123456lsmuni.lt ; Tel.: +370-460-30012
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-1402
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-6898
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-2151
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-5303
                Article
                ijerph-17-08003
                10.3390/ijerph17218003
                7662819
                33143183
                43ccee40-865b-45f8-b7d0-c092ff5b15ad
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 September 2020
                : 27 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                coronary artery disease,mental exertion,physical performance,psychometric properties,multidimensional fatigue inventory,fatigue,reliability and validity,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article