5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration as precursors to suicide

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It remains unclear how often and under what circumstances intimate partner violence (IPV) precedes suicide. Available research on IPV and suicide focuses largely on homicide-suicide, which is a rare event (<2% of suicides). We focus instead on single suicides (i.e., suicides unconnected to other violent deaths), which are the most common type of fatal violence in the US.

          Unfortunately, information about IPV circumstances is often unavailable for suicides. To address this gap, we sought to identify the proportion of single suicides that were preceded by IPV in North Carolina (NC), to describe the prevalence of IPV victimization and perpetration as precursors to suicide, and to explore how IPV-related suicides differ from other suicides. We used data from the NC Violent Death Reporting System (2010–2017, n = 9682 single suicides) and hand-reviewed textual data for a subset of cases (n = 2440) to document IPV circumstances.

          We had robust inter-rater reliability (Kappa: 0.73) and identified n = 439 IPV-related suicides. Most were males who had perpetrated nonfatal IPV (n = 319, 72.7%) prior to dying by suicide. Our findings suggest that IPV was a precursor for at least 4.5% of single suicides.

          Next, we conducted logistic regression analyses by sex comparing IPV-related suicides to other suicides. For both men and women, IPV was more common when the person who died by suicide had recently disclosed suicidal intent, was younger, used a firearm, and was involved with the criminal legal system, even after controlling for covariates. We also found sex-specific correlates for IPV circumstances in suicide.

          Combined with homicide-suicide data (reported elsewhere), IPV is likely associated with 6.1% or more of suicides overall. Results suggest clear missed opportunities to intervene for this unique subpopulation, such as suicide screening and referral in IPV settings (e.g., batterer intervention programs, Family Justice Centers) that is tailored by sex.

          Highlights

          • Intimate partner violence is a precipitating factor for 4.5% of single suicides.

          • Most IPV-related single suicides were of men who perpetrated nonfatal IPV.

          • Decedents in IPV-related suicides often used a firearm and disclosed intent.

          • Integrated prevention strategies to target both IPV and suicide may be appropriate.

          • When combined with homicide-suicide data, IPV influences 6.1% of suicides overall.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

          Karen Devries and colleagues conduct a systematic review of longitudinal studies to evaluate the direction of association between symptoms of depression and intimate partner violence. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study.

            This 11-city study sought to identify risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships. Proxies of 220 intimate partner femicide victims identified from police or medical examiner records were interviewed, along with 343 abused control women. Preincident risk factors associated in multivariate analyses with increased risk of intimate partner femicide included perpetrator's access to a gun and previous threat with a weapon, perpetrator's stepchild in the home, and estrangement, especially from a controlling partner. Never living together and prior domestic violence arrest were associated with lowered risks. Significant incident factors included the victim having left for another partner and the perpetrator's use of a gun. Other significant bivariate-level risks included stalking, forced sex, and abuse during pregnancy. There are identifiable risk factors for intimate partner femicides.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence.

              A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence was conducted. Inclusion criteria included publication in a peer-reviewed journal, a representative community sample or a clinical sample with a control-group comparison, a response rate of at least 50%, use of a physical or sexual violence outcome measure, and control of confounding factors in the analyses. A total of 228 articles were included (170 articles with adult and 58 with adolescent samples). Organized by levels of a dynamic developmental systems perspective, risk factors included: (a) contextual characteristics of partners (demographic, neighborhood, community and school factors), (b) developmental characteristics and behaviors of the partners (e.g., family, peer, psychological/behavioral, and cognitive factors), and (c) relationship influences and interactional patterns. Comparisons to a prior review highlight developments in the field in the past 10 years. Recommendations for intervention and policy along with future directions for intimate partner violence (IPV) risk factor research are presented.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM - Population Health
                Elsevier
                2352-8273
                25 March 2022
                June 2022
                25 March 2022
                : 18
                : 101079
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina - Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [b ]University of North Carolina Injury and Violence Prevention Research Center, NC, USA
                [c ]University of Maryland- School of Social Work, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [d ]University of North Carolina- School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [e ]Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. 725 M.L.K. Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Julie.Kafka@ 123456unc.edu
                Article
                S2352-8273(22)00058-1 101079
                10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101079
                8968650
                35372658
                44ed487b-a19e-49d8-80f7-7f44b2b65339
                © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 5 January 2022
                : 26 February 2022
                : 22 March 2022
                Categories
                Article

                suicide,intimate partner violence,surveillance,domestic violence,firearms

                Comments

                Comment on this article