14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

          Methods

          MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in medical and healthcare students and professionals. Studies measuring any aspect of ‘clinical empathy’ as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of the impact of empathy training on participants’ empathy levels were performed.

          Results

          Twenty-six trials were included, with 22 providing adequate data for meta-analysis. An overall moderate effect on participant empathy postintervention (standardised mean difference 0.52, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67) was found. Heterogeneity across trial results was substantial (I 2=63%). Data on sustainability of effect was provided by 11 trials and found a moderate effect size for improved empathy up until 12 weeks (0.69, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.15), and a small but statistically significant effect size for sustainability at 12 weeks and beyond (standardised mean difference 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57). In total, 15 studies were considered to be either unclear or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence of included studies was low.

          Conclusion

          Findings suggest that empathy-enhancing interventions can be effective at cultivating and sustaining empathy with intervention specifics contributing to effectiveness. This review focuses on an important, growing area of medical education and provides guidance to those looking to develop effective interventions to enhance empathy in the healthcare setting. Further high-quality trials are needed that include patient-led outcome assessments and further evaluate the long-term sustainability of empathy training.

          Protocol registration number

          PROSPERO (CRD42019126843).

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A measure of emotional empathy.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures.

            To formulate a parsimonious tool to assess empathy, we used factor analysis on a combination of self-report measures to examine consensus and developed a brief self-report measure of this common factor. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) represents empathy as a primarily emotional process. In 3 studies, the TEQ demonstrated strong convergent validity, correlating positively with behavioral measures of social decoding, self-report measures of empathy, and negatively with a measure of Autism symptomatology. Moreover, it exhibited good internal consistency and high test-retest reliability. The TEQ is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument for the assessment of empathy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physician Empathy: Definition, Components, Measurement, and Relationship to Gender and Specialty

              There is a dearth of empirical research on physician empathy despite its mediating role in patient-physician relationships and clinical outcomes. This study was designed to investigate the components of physician empathy, its measurement properties, and group differences in empathy scores.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                25 September 2020
                : 10
                : 9
                : e036471
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCollege of Life Sciences , University of Leicester , Leicester, UK
                [2 ]departmentBodleian Health Care Libraries , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [3 ]departmentFaculty of Philosophy , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Rachel Winter; rw205@ 123456le.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-2461
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-036471
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471
                7520826
                32978187
                456e8ed3-7ade-4419-a266-0cf47c37d11c
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 December 2019
                : 13 July 2020
                : 20 August 2020
                Categories
                Medical Education and Training
                1506
                1709
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                medical education & training,education & training (see medical education & training),statistics & research methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content152

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors951