6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Weber C ankle fractures: a retrospective audit of screw number, size, complications, and retrieval rates.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tibiofibular transfixation of Weber C injuries using a diastasis screw is the current method of fixation. However, controversy remains regarding the screw size and number, number of cortices engaged, and the interval to screw removal. The present study reviewed the current practice in the Wellington Region. A retrospective audit of patients with documented Weber C injuries in the Capital & Coast District Health Board from June 2012 to December 2013 was performed. The clinical medical records and radiographs were reviewed, and the patient demographics, surgeon details, screw number, size, cortices engaged, screw removal period, and documented complications were recorded. A total of 36 operations were documented, of which 27 (75%) cases also required fibula plating. Of the 36 cases, 25 (69.44%) used a single diastasis screw, 33 (91.67%) used 4.5-mm screws, and 18 (50%) engaged 3 cortices. Surgical practice did not vary with the experience level. Of the 36 patients, 29 (80.56%) underwent routine screw removal at a median of 20 (25th to 75th quartile range 16 to 22) weeks. Also, 9 (25%) cases of screw fracture occurred, with a median documented interval to fracture of 18 (25th to 75th quartile range 15 to 20) weeks. The surgical management of Weber C injuries is consistent with current practice. The routine removal of diastasis screws by 20 weeks postoperatively was not different from the documented interval of screw removal when screw fractures had occurred. The timing of screw removal needs to be weighed against the fracture risk, patient symptoms, and the risk of secondary procedure complications.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Foot Ankle Surg
          The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
          Elsevier BV
          1542-2224
          1067-2516
          January 27 2015
          : 54
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Orthopaedic House Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand; Honorary Clinical Lecturer in Orthopaedics, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand. Electronic address: logan.walker@ccdhb.org.nz.
          [2 ] Orthopaedic Consultant Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand; Clinical Lecturer in Orthopaedics, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.
          Article
          S1067-2516(14)00580-8
          10.1053/j.jfas.2014.11.015
          25619809
          46a6b357-de40-48cc-ae75-5f3216769e13
          Copyright © 2015 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          cortices,diastasis screw,screw breakage,screw removal,syndesmosis

          Comments

          Comment on this article