13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      One-shot Synesthesia

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 3 , 4
      Translational Neuroscience
      De Gruyter Open
      Synesthesia, Ideasthesia, Semantics, Experience

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Synesthesia is commonly thought to be a phenomenon of fixed associations between an outside inducer and a vivid concurrent experience. Hence, it has been proposed that synesthesia occurs due to additional connections in the brain with which synesthetes are born. Here we show that synesthesia can be a much richer and more flexible phenomenon with a capability to creatively construct novel synesthetic experiences as events unfold in people’s lives. We describe here cases of synesthetes who occasionally generate novel synesthetic experience, called one-shot synesthesias. These synesthetic experiences seem to share all the properties with the classical synesthetic associations except that they occur extremely rarely, people recalling only a few events over the lifetime. It appears that these one-shots are not created at random but are instead responses to specific life events. We contrast the properties of those rare synesthetic events with other, more commonly known forms of synesthesia that also create novel synesthetic experiences, but at a high rate—sometimes creating novel experiences every few seconds. We argue that one-shot synesthesias indicate that synesthetic associations are by their nature not prewired at birth but are dynamically constructed through mental operations and according to the needs of a synesthetic mind. Our conclusions have implications for understanding the biological underpinnings of synesthesia and the role the phenomenon plays in the lives of people endowed with synesthetic capacities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanisms of synesthesia: cognitive and physiological constraints.

          Synesthesia is a conscious experience of systematically induced sensory attributes that are not experienced by most people under comparable conditions. Recent findings from cognitive psychology, functional brain imaging and electrophysiology have shed considerable light on the nature of synesthesia and its neurocognitive underpinnings. These cognitive and physiological findings are discussed with respect to a neuroanatomical framework comprising hierarchically organized cortical sensory pathways. We advance a neurobiological theory of synesthesia that fits within this neuroanatomical framework.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Synaesthesia: the prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences.

            Sensory and cognitive mechanisms allow stimuli to be perceived with properties relating to sight, sound, touch, etc, and ensure, for example, that visual properties are perceived as visual experiences, rather than sounds, tastes, smells, etc. Theories of normal development can be informed by cases where this modularity breaks down, in a condition known as synaesthesia. Conventional wisdom has held that this occurs extremely rarely (0.05% of births) and affects women more than men. Here we present the first test of synaesthesia prevalence with sampling that does not rely on self-referral, and which uses objective tests to establish genuineness. We show that (a) the prevalence of synaesthesia is 88 times higher than previously assumed, (b) the most common variant is coloured days, (c) the most studied variant (grapheme-colour synaesthesia)--previously believed most common--is prevalent at 1%, and (d) there is no strong asymmetry in the distribution of synaesthesia across the sexes. Hence, we suggest that female biases reported earlier likely arose from (or were exaggerated by) sex differences in self-disclosure.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Thinking Fast and Slow

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transl Neurosci
                Transl Neurosci
                tnsci
                tnsci
                Translational Neuroscience
                De Gruyter Open
                2081-3856
                2081-6936
                25 November 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 167-175
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Aurelius Sängerknaben Calw , calw, Germany
                [2 ]Teradata , Frankfurt, Germany
                [3 ]Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University , Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [4 ]deptDepartment of Psychology , universityUniversity of Zagreb , Zagreb, Croatia
                Author notes
                Article
                tnsci-2017-0023
                10.1515/tnsci-2017-0023
                5703764
                47c6a354-65e7-4886-bb96-1937062c6e40
                © 2017 Alexandra Kirschner, Danko Nikolić

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

                History
                : 24 May 2016
                : 2 October 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                Regular Articles

                synesthesia,ideasthesia,semantics,experience
                synesthesia, ideasthesia, semantics, experience

                Comments

                Comment on this article