15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Academic pediatric clinical research: factors associated with study implementation duration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The ethical, methodological, and technical aspects of pediatric research, often results in complications and delays in implementation. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the implementation duration of hospital-based pediatric studies.

          Methods

          All hospital-based pediatric studies sponsored by AP-HP between 2002 and 2008 were retrospectively identified. Association of the funding mechanism and methodological factors with the implementation duration was assessed using a multivariable mixed linear model. Pharmaceutical factors were explored as part of a subgroup analysis restricted to the studies involving drug therapy. Given that we took an exploratory approach, factors associated with implementation duration with p < 0.10 were kept in the final models.

          Results

          A total of 139 studies were evaluated. The median implementation duration was 17.1 months (range: 0.9-55.3 months), and tended to increase over time (from 14.9 [25 th percentile-75 th percentile: 11.5-19.9] months in 2002 to 23.7 [15.2-31.0] months in 2008, p = 0.01). External (coefficient [95 % confidence interval]: -7.7 [-11.9;-3.5] months, p < 0.001) and internal funding (-5.3 95 % CI [-9.8;-0.8], p = 0.02) compared to governmental funding and number of centers (-0.1 95 % CI[-0.2;0.02] months for 1 center increase, p = 0.07) were associated with reduced duration, whereas interventional study (either involving drug therapy (6.0 95 % CI[0.7;11.3] months, p = 0.03 or not (3.5 95 % CI[-0.3;7.3] months, p = 0.06) was associated with increased duration compared to observational study. Regarding the 35 studies involving drug therapy, external funding decreased duration (-6.7 95 % CI[-13.2;-0.2] months, p = 0.05), whereas studies involving solely a pediatric population (7.8 95 % CI[1.1;14.5] months, p = 0.01) (compared to mixed adult-pediatric population), a placebo-controlled design (6.6 95 % CI[0.9;12.3] months, p = 0.01), and inappropriate drug formulation for at least one drug used in the study (6.9 95 % CI[-0.2;14.0] months, p = 0.06) were associated with increased duration.

          Conclusion

          Implementation of hospital-based pediatric studies primarily faced delays when they were interventional and, in particular, when they involved drug therapy. Regarding the latter, difficulties that resulted in delayed studies arose with respect to the supply of drugs and placebo in age-appropriate dosages and route of administration. Therefore, difficulties related to the use of pharmaceuticals need to be anticipated earlier in order to avoid implementation delays.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0138-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical trials in children.

          The imperative to undertake randomised trials in children arises from extraordinary advances in basic biomedical sciences, needing a matching commitment to translational research if child health is to reap the benefits from this new knowledge. Unfortunately, many prescribed treatments for children have not been adequately tested in children, sometimes resulting in harmful treatments being given and beneficial treatments being withheld. Government, industry, funding agencies, and clinicians are responsible for research priorities being adult-focused because of the greater burden of disease in adults, coupled with financial and marketing considerations. This bias has meant that the equal rights of children to participate in trials has not always been recognised. This is changing, however, as the need for clinical trials in children has been increasingly recognised by the scientific community and broader public, leading to new legislation in some countries making trials of interventions mandatory in children as well as adults before drug approval is given. Trials in children are more challenging than those in adults. The pool of eligible children entering trials is often small because many conditions are uncommon in children, and the threshold for gaining consent is often higher and more complex because parents have to make decisions about trial participation on behalf of their child. Uncertain about what is best, despite supporting the notion of trials in principle, parents and paediatricians generally opt for the new intervention or for standard care rather than trial participation. In this review, we explore issues relating to trial participation for children and suggest some strategies for improving the conduct of clinical trials involving children.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Formulation of medicines for children.

            The development of age-adapted dosage forms and taste-masking of bitter-tasting drugs administered orally for children, are formidable challenges for formulation scientists. Childhood is a period of maturation requiring knowledge of developmental pharmacology to establish dose but the ability of the child to manage different dosage forms and devices also changes. Paediatric formulations must allow accurate administration of the dose to children of widely varying age and weight. Whilst the oral route will be preferred for long term use and the intravenous route for the acutely ill, many of the dosage forms designed for adults, such as oro-dispersible tablets, buccal gels and transdermal patches, would also benefit children if they contained an appropriate paediatric dose. The age at which children can swallow conventional tablets is of great importance for their safety. Liquid medicines are usually recommended for infants and younger children so the ability to mask unpleasant taste with sweeteners and flavours is crucial. More sophisticated formulations such as granules and oro-dispersible tablets may be required but there will be limitations on choice and concentration of excipients. There are many gaps in our knowledge about paediatric formulations and many challenges for the industry if suitable preparations are to be available for all ranges. A CHMP points to consider document is soon to be released. More research and clinical feedback are important because a formulation with poor acceptability may affect compliance, prescribing practice and ultimately commercial viability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ten steps towards improving prognosis research.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +41 61 704 28 47 , delphine.gd@gmail.com
                annick.tibi@eps.aphp.fr
                hendya@hotmail.com
                sonia.prot-labarthe@rdb.aphp.fr
                francoise.brion@rdb.aphp.fr
                olivier.bourdon@rdb.aphp.fr
                corinne.alberti@inserm.fr
                Journal
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Medical Research Methodology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2288
                29 March 2016
                29 March 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 36
                Affiliations
                [ ]Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR-1123 ECEVE, F-75019 Paris, France
                [ ]AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, Unité d’Epidémiologie Clinique, F-75019 Paris, France
                [ ]Inserm, U1123 and CICEC 1426, F-75019 Paris, France
                [ ]University of Basel, University Children’s Hospital (UKBB), Basel, Switzerland
                [ ]Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75270 Paris, France
                [ ]Département d’Essais Cliniques, AP-HP, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé, F-75013 Paris, France
                [ ]AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, Pharmacie à Usage Intérieur, F-75019 Paris, France
                [ ]Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, University Children`s Hospital Basel (UKBB), Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
                Article
                138
                10.1186/s12874-016-0138-y
                4812626
                27025840
                486af87a-647d-429d-bf9d-3380ff6bc362
                © Meier-Girard et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 July 2015
                : 18 March 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002738, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (FR);
                Award ID: RSR08001
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                pediatrics,biomedical research,academic medical centers,delay in studies implementation

                Comments

                Comment on this article