14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mixed methods research in tobacco control with youth and young adults: A methodological review of current strategies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Tobacco use among young people is a complex and serious global dilemma that demands innovative and diverse research approaches. The purpose of this methodological review was to examine the current use of mixed methods research in tobacco control with youth and young adult populations and to develop practical recommendations for tobacco control researchers interested in this methodology.

          Methods

          Using PubMed, we searched five peer-reviewed journals that publish tobacco control empirical literature for the use of mixed methods research to study young populations, age 12–25 years. Our team analyzed the features of each article in terms of tobacco control topic, population, youth engagement strategies, and several essential elements of mixed methods research.

          Results

          We identified 23 mixed methods studies published by authors from five different countries reported between 2004 and 2015. These 23 articles examined various topics that included tobacco use behavior, tobacco marketing and branding, and cessation among youth and young adults. The most common mixed methods approach was variations of the concurrent design in which the qualitative and quantitative strands were administered at the same time and given equal priority. This review documented several innovative applications of mixed methods research as well as challenges in the reporting of the complex research designs.

          Conclusions

          The use of mixed methods research in tobacco control has great potential for advancing the understanding of complex behavioral and sociocultural issues for all groups, especially youth and young adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Designing and conducting mixed methods research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reasons for Electronic Cigarette Experimentation and Discontinuation Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

              Understanding why young people try and stop electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is critical to inform e-cigarette regulatory efforts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                25 August 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 8
                : e0183471
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
                [2 ] Maryland Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
                [3 ] Educational Studies, School of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
                Hokkaido Daigaku, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1125-3578
                Article
                PONE-D-16-22418
                10.1371/journal.pone.0183471
                5571971
                28841689
                488f7556-2892-4f74-b494-485f2b32f51b
                © 2017 Fryer et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 3 June 2016
                : 7 July 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: K01CA148789
                Award Recipient :
                This study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) by grant # K01CA148789: CSF Principal Investigator. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Tobacco Control
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Qualitative Studies
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Habits
                Smoking Habits
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Young Adults
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Schools
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Social Research
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article