The earliest models for how morphogen gradients guide embryonic patterning failed to account for experimental observations of temporal refinement in gene expression domains. Following theoretical and experimental work in this area, dynamic positional information has emerged as a conceptual framework to discuss how cells process spatiotemporal inputs into downstream patterns. Here, we show that diffusion determines the mathematical means by which bistable gene expression boundaries shift over time, and therefore how cells interpret positional information conferred from morphogen concentration. First, we introduce a metric for assessing reproducibility in boundary placement or precision in systems where gene products do not diffuse, but where morphogen concentrations are permitted to change in time. We show that the dynamics of the gradient affect the sensitivity of the final pattern to variation in initial conditions, with slower gradients reducing the sensitivity. Second, we allow gene products to diffuse and consider gene expression boundaries as propagating wavefronts with velocity modulated by local morphogen concentration. We harness this perspective to approximate a PDE model as an ODE that captures the position of the boundary in time, and demonstrate the approach with a preexisting model for Hunchback patterning in fruit fly embryos. We then propose a design that employs antiparallel morphogen gradients to achieve accurate boundary placement that is robust to scaling. Throughout our work we draw attention to tradeoffs among initial conditions, boundary positioning, and the relative timescales of network and gradient evolution. We conclude by suggesting that mathematical theory should serve to clarify not just our quantitative, but also our intuitive understanding of patterning processes.
In many developmental systems, cells interpret spatial gradients of chemical morphogens to produce gene expression boundaries in exact positions. The simplest mathematical models for positional information rely on threshold detection, but such models are not robust to variations in the morphogen gradient or initial protein concentrations. Furthermore, these models fail to account for experimental results showing dynamic shifts in boundary placement and increased boundary precision over time. Here, we argue that dynamic positional information is interpreted differently by a bistable patterning system depending upon whether gene expression products diffuse. We explore two mathematical methods to analyze pattern refinement with and without diffusion, and discuss design tradeoffs among precision, placement, accuracy, and timescale. We suggest that future research into dynamic positional information would benefit from perspectives that link local (cellular) and global (patterning) behaviors, as well as from mathematical theory that builds our intuitive understanding alongside more data-driven approaches.