0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      BRCA1 and ELK-1 regulate neural progenitor cell fate in the optic tectum in response to visual experience in Xenopus laevis tadpoles

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Activity in the developing brain affects the fate of multipotent neural progenitor cells, for instance, whether they continue dividing or differentiate into neurons. We conducted an unbiased screen to identify candidate mechanisms that influence neural progenitor cell fate by analyzing differentially expressed transcriptomes from neural progenitor cells and newly differentiated neurons in Xenopus tadpoles following exposure to a visual experience regime known to affect neurogenesis. We identified BRCA1 and ELK-1 as members of a differentially expressed network of transcriptional regulators. Longitudinal in vivo time-lapse imaging indicates that BRCA1 and ELK1 regulate neural progenitor cell fate and that the effects of visual experience on cell fate decisions require BRCA1 and ELK-1. This study expands our understanding of the mechanisms governing brain development.

          Abstract

          In developing Xenopus tadpoles, the optic tectum begins to receive patterned visual input while visuomotor circuits are still undergoing neurogenesis and circuit assembly. This visual input regulates neural progenitor cell fate decisions such that maintaining tadpoles in the dark increases proliferation, expanding the progenitor pool, while visual stimulation promotes neuronal differentiation. To identify regulators of activity-dependent neural progenitor cell fate, we profiled the transcriptomes of proliferating neural progenitor cells and newly differentiated neurons using RNA-Seq. We used advanced bioinformatic analysis of 1,130 differentially expressed transcripts to identify six differentially regulated transcriptional regulators, including Breast Cancer 1 (BRCA1) and the ETS-family transcription factor, ELK-1, which are predicted to regulate the majority of the other differentially expressed transcripts. BRCA1 is known for its role in cancers, but relatively little is known about its potential role in regulating neural progenitor cell fate. ELK-1 is a multifunctional transcription factor which regulates immediate early gene expression. We investigated the potential functions of BRCA1 and ELK-1 in activity-regulated neurogenesis in the tadpole visual system using in vivo time-lapse imaging to monitor the fate of GFP-expressing SOX2+ neural progenitor cells in the optic tectum. Our longitudinal in vivo imaging analysis showed that knockdown of either BRCA1 or ELK-1 altered the fates of neural progenitor cells and furthermore that the effects of visual experience on neurogenesis depend on BRCA1 and ELK-1 expression. These studies provide insight into the potential mechanisms by which neural activity affects neural progenitor cell fate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neuronal activity-induced Gadd45b promotes epigenetic DNA demethylation and adult neurogenesis.

          The mammalian brain exhibits diverse types of neural plasticity, including activity-dependent neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. How transient activation of mature neurons leads to long-lasting modulation of adult neurogenesis is unknown. Here we identify Gadd45b as a neural activity-induced immediate early gene in mature hippocampal neurons. Mice with Gadd45b deletion exhibit specific deficits in neural activity-induced proliferation of neural progenitors and dendritic growth of newborn neurons in the adult hippocampus. Mechanistically, Gadd45b is required for activity-induced DNA demethylation of specific promoters and expression of corresponding genes critical for adult neurogenesis, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor. Thus, Gadd45b links neuronal circuit activity to epigenetic DNA modification and expression of secreted factors in mature neurons for extrinsic modulation of neurogenesis in the adult brain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Activity-Regulated Transcription: Bridging the Gap between Neural Activity and Behavior

            Gene transcription is the process by which the genetic codes of organisms are read and interpreted as a set of instructions for cells to divide, differentiate, migrate, and mature. As cells function in their respective niches, transcription further allows mature cells to interact dynamically with their external environment, while reliably retaining fundamental information about past experiences. In this review, we provide an overview of the field of activity-dependent transcription in the vertebrate brain and highlight contemporary work that ranges from studies of activity-dependent chromatin modifications to plasticity mechanisms underlying adaptive behaviors. We identify key gaps in knowledge and propose integrated approaches towards a deeper understanding of how activity-dependent transcription promotes the refinement and plasticity of neural circuits for cognitive function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Notch signalling in vertebrate neural development.

              Signals through the Notch receptors are used throughout development to control cellular fate choices. Loss- and gain-of-function studies revealed both the pleiotropic action of the Notch signalling pathway in development and the potential of Notch signals as tools to influence the developmental path of undifferentiated cells. As we review here, Notch signalling affects the development of the nervous system at many different levels. Understanding the complex genetic circuitry that allows Notch signals to affect specific cell fates in a context-specific manner defines the next challenge, especially as such an understanding might have important implications for regenerative medicine.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                10 January 2024
                16 January 2024
                10 January 2024
                : 121
                : 3
                : e2316542121
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Neuroscience, Dorris Neuroscience Center, Scripps Research Institute , La Jolla, CA 92037
                Author notes
                5To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: cline@ 123456scripps.edu .

                Contributed by Hollis T. Cline; received September 27, 2023; accepted December 5, 2023; reviewed by Juan Larraín and Amy K. Sater

                1L.-C.H. and C.R.M. contributed equally to this work.

                2Present address: Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA 19477.

                3Present address: Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.

                4Present address: Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA 92122.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-6012
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-9603
                Article
                202316542
                10.1073/pnas.2316542121
                10801852
                38198524
                49605d1a-5baa-41c1-8f05-6ec66b07879e
                Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 27 September 2023
                : 05 December 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 11, Words: 7677
                Funding
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), FundRef 100000065;
                Award ID: NS076006
                Award Recipient : LinChien Huang Award Recipient : Hai-Yan He Award Recipient : Aaron Ta Award Recipient : Hollis Cline
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI), FundRef 100000053;
                Award ID: EY011261
                Award Recipient : LinChien Huang Award Recipient : Hai-Yan He Award Recipient : Aaron Ta Award Recipient : Hollis Cline
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI), FundRef 100000053;
                Award ID: EY031597
                Award Recipient : LinChien Huang Award Recipient : Hai-Yan He Award Recipient : Aaron Ta Award Recipient : Hollis Cline
                Funded by: California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), FundRef 100000900;
                Award ID: 01165
                Award Recipient : LinChien Huang
                Categories
                dataset, Dataset
                research-article, Research Article
                neuro, Neuroscience
                424
                Biological Sciences
                Neuroscience

                neural progenitor cell,differential expression,xenopus,transcription,brca1

                Comments

                Comment on this article