6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Kill rate as a tool in efficiency evaluation of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) mass reared on factitious food

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The predatory mites of the Phytoseiidae family are crucial biological control agents widely utilized in biological pest management targeting phytophagous mites and insects. Key factors in these control strategies are that phytoseiids must be able to find their main target prey and to maintain high populations and efficacy. To reduce expenses and time-consuming production methods of mass rearing of phytoseiids, pollen and other factitious (i.e., non-natural/nontarget) hosts need to be present as an alternative food for predatory mite populations. The mass-rearing possibilities of these predators on alternative food sources, such as astigmatid mites (i.e., house and stored mites) and pollen, must be evaluated not only by the cost of rearing settings but on the basis of their efficiency maintenance in killing prey. The pest kill rate ( k m ) is the average daily lifetime killing of the pest by the natural enemy under consideration and can represent a useful indicator for phytoseiids efficacy to rank them as BCAs on the basis of their effective killing/predation on target prey. In this study, we evidenced that 2 astigmatid mites, Glycyphagus domesticus (De Geer) and Lepidoglyphus destructor (Schrank), and Quercus ilex L. pollen can be successfully adopted as substitute food sources for mass rearing of the phytoseiid Neoseiulus californicus (MgGregor); then, we determined that these populations of BCAs maintained a consistent k m at new/first impact on the main target pest, Tetranychus urticae Koch.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Intrinsic Rate of Natural Increase of an Insect Population

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biological control and sustainable food production.

              The use of biological control for the management of pest insects pre-dates the modern pesticide era. The first major successes in biological control occurred with exotic pests controlled by natural enemy species collected from the country or area of origin of the pest (classical control). Augmentative control has been successfully applied against a range of open-field and greenhouse pests, and conservation biological control schemes have been developed with indigenous predators and parasitoids. The cost-benefit ratio for classical biological control is highly favourable (1:250) and for augmentative control is similar to that of insecticides (1:2-1:5), with much lower development costs. Over the past 120 years, more than 5000 introductions of approximately 2000 non-native control agents have been made against arthropod pests in 196 countries or islands with remarkably few environmental problems. Biological control is a key component of a 'systems approach' to integrated pest management, to counteract insecticide-resistant pests, withdrawal of chemicals and minimize the usage of pesticides. Current studies indicate that genetically modified insect-resistant Bt crops may have no adverse effects on the activity or function of predators or parasitoids used in biological control. The introduction of rational approaches for the environmental risk assessment of non-native control agents is an essential step in the wider application of biological control, but future success is strongly dependent on a greater level of investment in research and development by governments and related organizations that are committed to a reduced reliance on chemical control.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Subject Editor
                Journal
                J Insect Sci
                J Insect Sci
                jis
                Journal of Insect Science
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1536-2442
                September 2023
                18 September 2023
                18 September 2023
                : 23
                : 5
                : 10
                Affiliations
                Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) , Florence, Italy
                Department of Agricultural and FoodSciences, University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) , Florence, Italy
                Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) , Florence, Italy
                Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) , Florence, Italy
                Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) , Florence, Italy
                Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) , Florence, Italy
                Department of Agricultural and FoodSciences, University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                Author notes
                Corresponding author, mail: sauro.simoni@ 123456crea.gov.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2396-2344
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2209-5887
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-8322
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9487-7975
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-6781
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-9250
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-200X
                Article
                iead061
                10.1093/jisesa/iead061
                10506452
                37721502
                4a1aaec8-e8df-48e1-b71f-057fd6234ff9
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 June 2023
                : 10 July 2023
                : 31 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                Special Collection: Mass Rearing Collection
                Research
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01382

                Entomology
                neoseiulus californicus,lepidoglyphus destructor,glycyphagus domesticus,quercus sp. pollen

                Comments

                Comment on this article