15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Upgradation and modernization of eye banking services: Integrating tradition with innovative policies and current best practices

      meeting-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          The purpose of this study is to review the history and evolution of the National Eye Bank (NEB) and analyze the impact over the years and report the outcome of the invested resources.

          Methods:

          Review of archival material, records, project reports, policy and procedures' manuals, and publications was done. Descriptive and analytical processing of data obtained was undertaken. Parameters evaluated included total collection, transplantation, utilization rates of donor cornea, changing trends over time in terms of numbers and duration of recipients waiting, impactful research translated into changes in standard operating protocols, new facilities, and subsequent effects on numbers or quality assurance measures and overview of major achievements. Periodic situational analysis with contextual relevance and interpretation of outcomes was done pertaining to national goals and international standards.

          Results:

          The NEB and cornea services have played a key leadership role in furthering the development of eye banking and corneal transplantation services. The contribution extends beyond routine patient care to education, training, generation of resources, advocacy, and policymaking. In quantifiable terms, the overall performance has steadily increased over the years. Major contributions include training of doctors, eye bank staff and corneal surgeons, introduction of innovative techniques for corneal transplantation, setting of national standards for eye banking and provision of preservation media, customized corneal, and ocular surface cell replacement therapy in collaboration with other departments and institutes.

          Conclusion:

          The eye banking and corneal transplantation facilities have evolved with time providing quality services, modernized as appropriate with updated knowledge and incorporating technological advances supported by the systematic evidence-based approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation of amniotic membrane transplantation as an adjunct to medical therapy as compared with medical therapy alone in acute ocular burns.

          To evaluate the role of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in acute ocular burns. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients with grade II to IV ocular burns within 3 weeks of injury were recruited. Thirty-seven patients, 7 of whom had bilateral involvement (total, 44 eyes), participated in the trial. Twenty eyes were included in group A (AMT) and 24 eyes were included in group B (controls). The eyes in the AMT group underwent AMT in addition to conventional medical therapy. In the control group, only conventional medical therapy was instituted. The patients' subjective assessments of relief of ocular discomfort, healing of the corneal epithelial defect, visual acuity, extent of corneal vascularization, formation of symblepharon, and tear function tests. At day 1, subjective ocular discomfort scores were reduced significantly in eyes with moderate burns in the AMT group compared with controls (P = 0.05), but there was no difference between the 2 groups in eyes with severe burns. The log mean percentage reduction in size of epithelial defect by day 7 was 7.43+/-0.89 after AMT and 6.23+/-1.10 with medical treatment alone in moderate grade burns at day 7 (P = 0.01), but there was no difference between the 2 groups in eyes with severe burns. There was no overall difference in the final visual acuity, symblepharon formation, corneal vascularization, and tear function tests between the 2 groups over the next 3 months and further follow-up. There was a high dropout rate for long-term follow-up. Amniotic membrane transplantation in eyes with acute ocular burns has advantages in terms of reduction of pain and promotion of early epithelialization in patients with moderate grade burns, but not so in severe burns. There seems to be no definite advantage to AMT over medical therapy alone in terms of improvement in visual acuity, appearance of symblepharon, corneal vascularization, and results of tear function tests on short-term follow-up.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adjuvant Role of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Acute Ocular Stevens-Johnson Syndrome: A Randomized Control Trial.

            To evaluate the adjuvant role of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in cases of acute ocular Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Factors affecting eye donation from postmortem cases in a tertiary care hospital.

              To evaluate the responses to requests for eye donation from relatives of postmortem cases in a tertiary care hospital in India. In a prospective study, the cases brought for postmortem to the Forensic Medicine Department were screened as potential donors by our team. The next of kin of potential donors were approached and counseled in a systematic manner following a standard interview pattern. Responses were noted in a predesigned performa. The religion, level of literacy, socioeconomic status, relationship with the deceased, prior knowledge of eye donation, willingness for eye donation, and reasons for not donating eyes of the deceased were recorded. One hundred fifty-nine potential donors were identified from a total of 721 postmortem cases. There were 119 (74.8%) men and 40 (25.2%) women. None of the deceased had previously pledged their eyes for eye donation. Eighty-eight (55.4%) next of kin were already aware of the concept of eye donation, but 71 (44.7%) families had not heard of it before. Willingness for eye donation was seen in 66 (41.5%), whereas 93 (58.5%) families refused eye donation. Of those already aware of eye donation, 39 (44.3%) gave consent for donation. Prior knowledge of eye donation had no influence on willingness for eye donation (P = 0.424). Similarly, literacy (P = 0.338) and socioeconomic status as estimated by a composite socioeconomic scale based on literacy and family income did not have any influence on willingness for eye donation (P = 0.338). Major reasons for not donating eyes included refusal to discuss the issue and dissuasion by distant relatives, legal problems, and religious beliefs. In our experience, literacy, socioeconomic status, and prior knowledge of eye donation of next kin had no correlation with donor corneal tissue procurement. Active counseling by a motivated team can be effective even in families with no prior knowledge and low socioeconomic status.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                IJO
                Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0301-4738
                1998-3689
                February 2017
                : 65
                : 2
                : 109-115
                Affiliations
                [1]Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Services, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                [1 ]Department of Community Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr. Radhika Tandon, Room 490, 4 th Floor, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029, India. E-mail: radhika_tan@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                IJO-65-109
                10.4103/ijo.IJO_862_16
                5381288
                28345565
                4a22a43b-bccc-4022-97e2-20466beeb48d
                Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 07 November 2016
                : 28 January 2017
                Categories
                Symposium

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                cornea,donation,eye bank,transplant
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                cornea, donation, eye bank, transplant

                Comments

                Comment on this article