12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Optimal MR Plaque Imaging for Cervical Carotid Artery Stenosis in Predicting the Development of Microembolic Signals during Exposure of Carotid Arteries in Endarterectomy: Comparison of 4 T1-Weighted Imaging Techniques

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

          Preoperative identification of plaque vulnerability may allow improved risk stratification for patients considered for carotid endarterectomy. The present study aimed to determine which plaque imaging technique, cardiac-gated black-blood fast spin-echo, magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo, source image of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, or noncardiac-gated spin-echo, most accurately predicts development of microembolic signals during exposure of carotid arteries in carotid endarterectomy.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Eighty patients with ICA stenosis (≥70%) underwent the 4 sequences of preoperative MR plaque imaging of the affected carotid bifurcation and then carotid endarterectomy under transcranial Doppler monitoring of microembolic signals in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. The contrast ratio of the carotid plaque was calculated by dividing plaque signal intensity by sternocleidomastoid muscle signal intensity.

          RESULTS:

          Microembolic signals during exposure of carotid arteries were detected in 23 patients (29%), 3 of whom developed new neurologic deficits postoperatively. Those deficits remained at 24 hours after surgery in only 1 patient. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to discriminate between the presence and absence of microembolic signals during exposure of the carotid arteries was significantly greater with nongated spin-echo than with black-blood fast spin-echo (difference between areas, 0.258; P < .0001), MPRAGE (difference between areas, 0.106; P = .0023), or source image of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (difference between areas, 0.128; P = .0010). Negative binomial regression showed that in the 23 patients with microembolic signals, the contrast ratio was associated with the number of microembolic signals only in nongated spin-echo (risk ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.97; P < .001).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Nongated spin-echo may predict the development of microembolic signals during exposure of the carotid arteries in carotid endarterectomy more accurately than other MR plaque imaging techniques.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          ajnr
          ajnr
          AJNR
          AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
          American Society of Neuroradiology
          0195-6108
          1936-959X
          June 2016
          : 37
          : 6
          : 1146-1154
          Affiliations
          [1] aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (Y.S., K.O., T.N., M.K., K.Y., A.O.)
          [2] bNeurology and Gerontology (S.N., A.S., Y.T.)
          [3] cDivision of Ultra-High Field MRI and Department of Radiology (M.S.), Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan
          [4] dGraduate School of Health Sciences (E.T.), Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to Kuniaki Ogasawara, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University, Uchimaru, 19-1, Morioka 020-8505, Japan; e-mail: kuogasa@ 123456iwate-med.ac.jp
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3108-4361
          Article
          PMC7963538 PMC7963538 7963538 14-00666
          10.3174/ajnr.A4674
          7963538
          26846926
          4b642d4c-ff20-41d5-bfe7-722462de0b90
          © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology

          Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

          History
          : 7 July 2014
          : 27 November 2015
          Categories
          Extracranial Vascular

          Comments

          Comment on this article