13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immune Checkpoints and CAR-T Cells: The Pioneers in Future Cancer Therapies?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although the ever-increasing number of cancer patients pose substantial challenges worldwide, finding a treatment with the highest response rate and the lowest number of side effects is still undergoing research. Compared to chemotherapy, the relatively low side effects of cancer immunotherapy have provided ample opportunity for immunotherapy to become a promising approach for patients with malignancy. However, the clinical translation of immune-based therapies requires robust anti-tumoral immune responses. Immune checkpoints have substantial roles in the induction of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and tolerance against tumor antigens. Identifying and targeting these inhibitory axes, which can be established between tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, can facilitate the development of anti-tumoral immune responses. Bispecific T-cell engagers, which can attract lymphocytes to the tumor microenvironment, have also paved the road for immunological-based tumor elimination. The development of CAR-T cells and their gene editing have brought ample opportunity to recognize tumor antigens, independent from immune checkpoints and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Indeed, there have been remarkable advances in developing various CAR-T cells to target tumoral cells. Knockout of immune checkpoints via gene editing in CAR-T cells might be designated for a breakthrough for patients with malignancy. In the midst of this fast progress in cancer immunotherapies, there is a need to provide up-to-date information regarding immune checkpoints, bispecific T-cell engagers, and CAR-T cells. Therefore, this review aims to provide recent findings of immune checkpoints, bispecific T-cell engagers, and CAR-T cells in cancer immunotherapy and discuss the pertained clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references163

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

          Among the most promising approaches to activating therapeutic antitumour immunity is the blockade of immune checkpoints. Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumours co-opt certain immune-checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Because many of the immune checkpoints are initiated by ligand-receptor interactions, they can be readily blocked by antibodies or modulated by recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies were the first of this class of immunotherapeutics to achieve US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Preliminary clinical findings with blockers of additional immune-checkpoint proteins, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), indicate broad and diverse opportunities to enhance antitumour immunity with the potential to produce durable clinical responses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

            An improvement in overall survival among patients with metastatic melanoma has been an elusive goal. In this phase 3 study, ipilimumab--which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response--administered with or without a glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide vaccine was compared with gp100 alone in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. A total of 676 HLA-A*0201-positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, whose disease had progressed while they were receiving therapy for metastatic disease, were randomly assigned, in a 3:1:1 ratio, to receive ipilimumab plus gp100 (403 patients), ipilimumab alone (137), or gp100 alone (136). Ipilimumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight, was administered with or without gp100 every 3 weeks for up to four treatments (induction). Eligible patients could receive reinduction therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. The median overall survival was 10.0 months among patients receiving ipilimumab plus gp100, as compared with 6.4 months among patients receiving gp100 alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; P<0.001). The median overall survival with ipilimumab alone was 10.1 months (hazard ratio for death in the comparison with gp100 alone, 0.66; P=0.003). No difference in overall survival was detected between the ipilimumab groups (hazard ratio with ipilimumab plus gp100, 1.04; P=0.76). Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10 to 15% of patients treated with ipilimumab and in 3% treated with gp100 alone. There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs (2.1%), and 7 were associated with immune-related adverse events. Ipilimumab, with or without a gp100 peptide vaccine, as compared with gp100 alone, improved overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Adverse events can be severe, long-lasting, or both, but most are reversible with appropriate treatment. (Funded by Medarex and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094653.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade

              The release of negative regulators of immune activation (immune checkpoints) that limit antitumor responses has resulted in unprecedented rates of long-lasting tumor responses in patients with a variety of cancers. This can be achieved by antibodies blocking the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway, either alone or in combination. The main premise for inducing an immune response is the pre-existence of antitumor T cells that were limited by specific immune checkpoints. Most patients who have tumor responses maintain long lasting disease control, yet one third of patients relapse. Mechanisms of acquired resistance are currently poorly understood, but evidence points to alterations that converge on the antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways. New generation combinatorial therapies may overcome resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                05 November 2020
                November 2020
                : 21
                : 21
                : 8305
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5165665811, Iran; hosseinkhanin@ 123456tbzmed.ac.ir (N.H.); derakhshania@ 123456tbzmed.ac.ir (A.D.); abdoli.med99@ 123456gmail.com (M.A.S.); hajiasgharzadeh@ 123456tbzmed.ac.ir (K.H.); amirbaghbanzadeh@ 123456gmail.com (A.B.); ahad.mokhtarzadeh@ 123456gmail.com (A.M.)
                [2 ]Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5166614766, Iran
                [3 ]Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5166614766, Iran
                [4 ]Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS IstitutoTumori “Giovanni Paolo II” of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy; dr.oronzo.brunetti@ 123456tiscali.it
                [5 ]Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand 9717853577, Iran; omidkoshki@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Cellular & Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand 9717853577, Iran; H.Safarpour@ 123456bums.ac.ir
                [7 ]Biotech Consulting, 44 Washington St, Brookline, MA 02445, USA; scyue1@ 123456gmail.com
                [8 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: n.silvestris@ 123456oncologico.bari.it (N.S.); baradaranb@ 123456tbzmed.ac.ir (B.B.); Tel.: +98-413-3371440
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-4145
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-233X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0398-6587
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-8779
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-4803
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-9186
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-6828
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-7318
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-6795
                Article
                ijms-21-08305
                10.3390/ijms21218305
                7663909
                33167514
                4b7a8499-117d-4fca-8c52-3d7489075021
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 October 2020
                : 03 November 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                cancer therapy,immune checkpoints,immunotherapy,car-t cells
                Molecular biology
                cancer therapy, immune checkpoints, immunotherapy, car-t cells

                Comments

                Comment on this article