58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cellular Control of Cortical Actin Nucleation

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          The contractile actin cortex is a thin layer of actin, myosin, and actin-binding proteins that subtends the membrane of animal cells. The cortex is the main determinant of cell shape and plays a fundamental role in cell division [ 1–3], migration [ 4], and tissue morphogenesis [ 5]. For example, cortex contractility plays a crucial role in amoeboid migration of metastatic cells [ 6] and during division, where its misregulation can lead to aneuploidy [ 7]. Despite its importance, our knowledge of the cortex is poor, and even the proteins nucleating it remain unknown, though a number of candidates have been proposed based on indirect evidence [ 8–15]. Here, we used two independent approaches to identify cortical actin nucleators: a proteomic analysis using cortex-rich isolated blebs, and a localization/small hairpin RNA (shRNA) screen searching for phenotypes with a weakened cortex or altered contractility. This unbiased study revealed that two proteins generated the majority of cortical actin: the formin mDia1 and the Arp2/3 complex. Each nucleator contributed a similar amount of F-actin to the cortex but had very different accumulation kinetics. Electron microscopy examination revealed that each nucleator affected cortical network architecture differently. mDia1 depletion led to failure in division, but Arp2/3 depletion did not. Interestingly, despite not affecting division on its own, Arp2/3 inhibition potentiated the effect of mDia1 depletion. Our findings indicate that the bulk of the actin cortex is nucleated by mDia1 and Arp2/3 and suggest a mechanism for rapid fine-tuning of cortex structure and mechanics by adjusting the relative contribution of each nucleator.

          Highlights

          • The Arp2/3 complex and the formin mDia1 nucleate the bulk of cortical F-actin

          • Nucleator depletion alters the cortex ultrastructural organization

          • Actin nucleated by mDia1 accumulates faster than actin nucleated by Arp2/3

          • mDia1 depletion leads to mitosis failure, an effect potentiated by Arp2/3 inhibition

          Abstract

          Bovellan et al. show that two actin nucleators, the formin mDia1 and the Arp2/3 complex, generate the bulk of the submembranous cortical F-actin. These nucleators have very different actin accumulation kinetics and play distinct roles in cortical actin organization, and their depletion differentially affects progression through the cell cycle.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Life at the leading edge.

          Cell migration requires sustained forward movement of the plasma membrane at the cell's front or "leading edge." To date, researchers have uncovered four distinct ways of extending the membrane at the leading edge. In lamellipodia and filopodia, actin polymerization directly pushes the plasma membrane forward, whereas in invadopodia, actin polymerization couples with the extracellular delivery of matrix-degrading metalloproteases to clear a path for cells through the extracellular matrix. Membrane blebs drive the plasma membrane forward using a combination of actomyosin-based contractility and reversible detachment of the membrane from the cortical actin cytoskeleton. Each protrusion type requires the coordination of a wide spectrum of signaling molecules and regulators of cytoskeletal dynamics. In addition, these different protrusion methods likely act in concert to move cells through complex environments in vivo. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Characterization of two classes of small molecule inhibitors of Arp2/3 complex

            Polymerization of actin filaments directed by the Arp2/3 complex supports many types of cellular movements1. However, questions remain regarding the relative contributions of Arp2/3 complex versus other mechanisms of actin filament nucleation to processes such as path finding by neuronal growth cones owing to the lack of simple methods to inhibit Arp2/3 complex reversibly in living cells. Here we describe two classes of small molecules that bind to different sites on Arp2/3 complex and inhibit its ability to nucleate actin filaments. CK-636 binds between Arp2 and Arp3 where it appears to block movement of Arp2 and Arp3 into their active conformation. CK-548 inserts into the hydrophobic core of Arp3 and alters its conformation. Both classes of compounds inhibit formation of actin filament comet tails by Listeria and podosomes by monocytes. Two inhibitors with different mechanisms of action provide a powerful approach for studying Arp2/3 complex in living cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hydrostatic pressure and the actomyosin cortex drive mitotic cell rounding.

              During mitosis, adherent animal cells undergo a drastic shape change, from essentially flat to round. Mitotic cell rounding is thought to facilitate organization within the mitotic cell and be necessary for the geometric requirements of division. However, the forces that drive this shape change remain poorly understood in the presence of external impediments, such as a tissue environment. Here we use cantilevers to track cell rounding force and volume. We show that cells have an outward rounding force, which increases as cells enter mitosis. We find that this mitotic rounding force depends both on the actomyosin cytoskeleton and the cells' ability to regulate osmolarity. The rounding force itself is generated by an osmotic pressure. However, the actomyosin cortex is required to maintain this rounding force against external impediments. Instantaneous disruption of the actomyosin cortex leads to volume increase, and stimulation of actomyosin contraction leads to volume decrease. These results show that in cells, osmotic pressure is balanced by inwardly directed actomyosin cortex contraction. Thus, by locally modulating actomyosin-cortex-dependent surface tension and globally regulating osmotic pressure, cells can control their volume, shape and mechanical properties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr. Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                21 July 2014
                21 July 2014
                : 24
                : 14
                : 1628-1635
                Affiliations
                [1 ]London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1H 0AH, UK
                [2 ]Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [3 ]Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3N 3J7, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [5 ]Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden 01307, Germany
                [6 ]International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw 02-109, Poland
                [7 ]Medical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [8 ]Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK
                [9 ]Laboratoire d’Enzymologie et Biochimie Structurales, CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author philippe.roux@ 123456umontreal.ca
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author e.paluch@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                [∗∗∗ ]Corresponding author g.charras@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                [10]

                Present address: Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, Université de Toulouse, UPS, 31000 Toulouse, France

                [11]

                Present address: Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

                Article
                S0960-9822(14)00670-8
                10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.069
                4110400
                25017211
                4b8dbda4-015b-4b85-924d-7a02ea88c347
                © 2014 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 18 November 2013
                : 2 May 2014
                : 28 May 2014
                Categories
                Report

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article