1,384
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    36
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles

      research-article
      1
      PLoS Biology
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Open access (OA) to the research literature has the potential to accelerate recognition and dissemination of research findings, but its actual effects are controversial. This was a longitudinal bibliometric analysis of a cohort of OA and non-OA articles published between June 8, 2004, and December 20, 2004, in the same journal (PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). Article characteristics were extracted, and citation data were compared between the two groups at three different points in time: at “quasi-baseline” (December 2004, 0–6 mo after publication), in April 2005 (4–10 mo after publication), and in October 2005 (10–16 mo after publication). Potentially confounding variables, including number of authors, authors' lifetime publication count and impact, submission track, country of corresponding author, funding organization, and discipline, were adjusted for in logistic and linear multiple regression models. A total of 1,492 original research articles were analyzed: 212 (14.2% of all articles) were OA articles paid by the author, and 1,280 (85.8%) were non-OA articles. In April 2005 (mean 206 d after publication), 627 (49.0%) of the non-OA articles versus 78 (36.8%) of the OA articles were not cited (relative risk = 1.3 [95% Confidence Interval: 1.1–1.6]; p = 0.001). 6 mo later (mean 288 d after publication), non-OA articles were still more likely to be uncited (non-OA: 172 [13.6%], OA: 11 [5.2%]; relative risk = 2.6 [1.4–4.7]; p < 0.001). The average number of citations of OA articles was higher compared to non-OA articles (April 2005: 1.5 [SD = 2.5] versus 1.2 [SD = 2.0]; Z = 3.123; p = 0.002; October 2005: 6.4 [SD = 10.4] versus 4.5 [SD = 4.9]; Z = 4.058; p < 0.001). In a logistic regression model, controlling for potential confounders, OA articles compared to non-OA articles remained twice as likely to be cited (odds ratio = 2.1 [1.5–2.9]) in the first 4–10 mo after publication (April 2005), with the odds ratio increasing to 2.9 (1.5–5.5) 10–16 mo after publication (October 2005). Articles published as an immediate OA article on the journal site have higher impact than self-archived or otherwise openly accessible OA articles. We found strong evidence that, even in a journal that is widely available in research libraries, OA articles are more immediately recognized and cited by peers than non-OA articles published in the same journal. OA is likely to benefit science by accelerating dissemination and uptake of research findings.

          Abstract

          A longitudinal bibliometric analysis of citations to papers published in the PNAS between June 8, 2004 and December 20, 2004 reveals that the open-access articles were more immediately recognized and cited by peers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Accessibility of information on the web.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                pbio
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                May 2006
                16 May 2006
                : 4
                : 5
                : e157
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network; and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                University of Tennessee United States
                Article
                10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157
                1459247
                16683865
                4bb66a31-d3cc-4e91-91b8-3f79eed90086
                Copyright: © 2006 Gunther Eysenbach. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 24 January 2006
                : 15 March 2006
                Categories
                Research Article
                Science Policy
                None

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                The study, already "referred to as a landmark study by colleagues" (Eysenbach), has been the first publication providing robust evidence for a citation advantage of articles published “originally” as (gold) open access articles in comparison with articles published in the same journal as non-open access (or non-immediate) open access articles. 

                2015-08-13 19:51 UTC
                +1

                Comment on this article