28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phylogeny of six genera of the subclass Haptoria (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) inferred from sequences of the gene coding for small subunit ribosomal RNA.

      The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
      Animals, Base Sequence, China, Ciliophora, classification, cytology, genetics, isolation & purification, DNA, Protozoan, DNA, Ribosomal, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, Ribosome Subunits, Small, Seawater, parasitology, Sequence Alignment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The small subunit ribosomal RNA genes of nine species belonging to six genera of litostome ciliates, namely Amphileptus aeschtae, Chaenea teres, Chaenea vorax, Lacrymaria marina, Litonotus paracygnus, Loxophyllum sp.-GD-070419, Loxophyllum jini, Loxophyllum rostratum, and Phialina salinarum, were sequenced for the first time. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using different methods to assess the inter- and intra-generic relationships of haptorians, of which Chaenea, Lacrymaria, Litonotus, and Phialina were analyzed for the first time based on molecular data. Monophyly of the order Pleurostomatida was strongly confirmed, and the two existing families of pleurostomatids, created on the basis of morphology, were confirmed by molecular evidence. Within the Pleurostomatida, Siroloxophyllum utriculariae occupied a well-supported position basal to the Loxophyllum clade, supporting the separation of these genera from one another. Both the subclass Haptoria and the order Haptorida were partially unresolved, possibly paraphyletic assemblages of taxa in all analyses, creating doubts about the traditional placement of some haptorid taxa. The existing sequence of L. rostratum in GenBank (DQ411864) was conspicuously different from that of the isolate from Qingdao, China sequenced in the present work, indicating that they are different species. The isolate from Qingdao was verified as L. rostratum by morphological analysis, and the published morphology of existing GenBank record of L. rostratum is different from it. Based on both morphological and molecular evidence, the latter may be congeneric with an undescribed species of Loxophyllum from Guangdong Province, China.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article