28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adult and yearling pampas deer stags ( Ozotoceros bezoarticus) display mild reproductive seasonal patterns with maximum values in autumn

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The pampas deer is an endangered species, from which reproductive biology little is known. We aimed to describe and compare the reproductive seasonal patterns of adult and yearling pampas deer stags throughout the year, including morphological traits, testosterone concentration, sperm morphology and cryoresistance pattern changes. Six adult (AS) and five yearling (YS) stags were captured with anesthetic darts once in winter, spring, summer and autumn to study morphological variables, serum testosterone and semen. Adult males were heavier, their neck girth tended to be greater and their testosterone concentration was higher than in YS. Animals were heavier in summer and autumn. Neck girth and testosterone concentration were greater in autumn. Scrotal circumference, testicular volume and gonado-somatic index varied with seasons, decreasing from winter to spring, increasing in summer and remaining in greater values in autumn. Sperm quality had maximum values from summer to winter. However, the cryoresistance ratio of motility score was greater in spring. In conclusion, in the captivity conditions, pampas deer stags seems to present a light seasonal reproductive pattern, with maximum testis size, testosterone secretion and fresh semen quality in autumn. Nevertheless, sperm cryoresistance ratio seemed to remain stable along the year. Although YS were still growing, they achieved similar semen quality than AS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reproductive seasonality in captive wild ruminants: implications for biogeographical adaptation, photoperiodic control, and life history

          Many ruminant species show seasonal patterns of reproduction. Causes for this are widely debated, and include adaptations to seasonal availability of resources (with cues either from body condition in more tropical, or from photoperiodism in higher latitude habitats) and/or defence strategies against predators. Conclusions so far are limited to datasets with less than 30 species. Here, we use a dataset on 110 wild ruminant species kept in captivity in temperate-zone zoos to describe their reproductive patterns quantitatively [determining the birth peak breadth (BPB) as the number of days in which 80% of all births occur]; then we link this pattern to various biological characteristics [latitude of origin, mother-young-relationship (hider/follower), proportion of grass in the natural diet (grazer/browser), sexual size dimorphism/mating system], and compare it with reports for free-ranging animals. When comparing taxonomic subgroups, variance in BPB is highly correlated to the minimum, but not the maximum BPB, suggesting that a high BPB (i.e. an aseasonal reproductive pattern) is the plesiomorphic character in ruminants. Globally, latitude of natural origin is highly correlated to the BPB observed in captivity, supporting an overruling impact of photoperiodism on ruminant reproduction. Feeding type has no additional influence; the hider/follower dichotomy, associated with the anti-predator strategy of 'swamping', has additional influence in the subset of African species only. Sexual size dimorphism and mating system are marginally associated with the BPB, potentially indicating a facilitation of polygamy under seasonal conditions. The difference in the calculated Julian date of conception between captive populations and that reported for free-ranging ones corresponds to the one expected if absolute day length was the main trigger in highly seasonal species: calculated day length at the time of conception between free-ranging and captive populations followed a y = x relationship. Only 11 species (all originating from lower latitudes) were considered to change their reproductive pattern distinctively between the wild and captivity, with 10 becoming less seasonal (but not aseasonal) in human care, indicating that seasonality observed in the wild was partly resource-associated. Only one species (Antidorcas marsupialis) became more seasonal in captivity, presumably because resource availability in the wild overrules the innate photoperiodic response. Reproductive seasonality explains additional variance in the body mass-gestation period relationship, with more seasonal species having shorter gestation periods for their body size. We conclude that photoperiodism, and in particular absolute day length, are genetically fixed triggers for reproduction that may be malleable to some extent by body condition, and that plasticity in gestation length is an important facilitator that may partly explain the success of ruminant radiation to high latitudes. Evidence for an anti-predator strategy involving seasonal reproduction is limited to African species. Reproductive seasonality following rainfall patterns may not be an adaptation to give birth in periods of high resource availability but an adaptation to allow conception only at times of good body condition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The way in which testosterone controls the social and sexual behavior of the red deer stag (Cervus elaphus)

            G Lincoln (1972)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples.

              In the present study, computer-automated sperm head morphometry of epididymal samples was used to determine if sperm head area and shape are useful measurements for separating "good" and "bad" Iberian red deer freezers. A microscope slide was prepared from single diluted sperm fresh samples collected from 38 mature stags. Slides were air-dried and stained with Hemacolor. The sperm head area and shape (length/width) for a minimum of 145 sperm heads were determined for each male by means of the Sperm-Class Analyser. The remainder of each sample was frozen. After thawing, sperm cryosurvival was judged in vitro by microscopic assessments of individual sperm motility and of plasma membrane and acrosome integrities. All sperm parameters evaluated at thawing were placed in a statistical database and a multivariate cluster analysis performed. Mean sperm parameters of the 2 clusters generated ("bad" and "good" freezers) were compared by ANOVA. Our results show that sperm quality at thawing for all sperm parameters evaluated was significantly higher (P < .01) for "good" freezers than for the "bad" ones (sperm motility index: 67.4 +/- 2.0 vs 57.1 +/- 2.8; NAR: 67.1 +/- 2.5 vs 54.5 +/- 3.5; viability: 68.8 +/- 2.0 vs 60.1 +/- 2.8; HOST: 71.3 +/- 2.2 vs 63.1 +/- 3.1). Additionally, differences (P < .01) in epididymal sperm head area and shape were found between "good" and "bad" freezers before freezing, with the smallest overall sperm head dimensions found in the "good" freezers group (area: 32.04 microm2 vs 34.42 microm2). Thus, the lower the sperm head area in the fresh samples, the greater the sperm cryoresistance. Our results show that the 2 groups of males also differ in sperm head shape in fresh samples (good: 1.96 vs poor: 1.72; P < .01). It is possible that sperm head area and shape influence total sperm volume, thus causing differences in heat exchange as well as in movements of water, ions, and cryoprotectants and, in turn, on sperm freezability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anim Reprod
                Anim Reprod
                ar
                Animal Reproduction
                Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal
                1806-9614
                1984-3143
                29 June 2020
                2020
                : 17
                : 2
                : e20200021
                Affiliations
                [1 ] originalDepartamento de Biociencias Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
                [2 ] originalLaboratorio de Reproducción Animal, Centro Universitario Regional Litoral Norte Salto, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay
                [3 ] originalLaboratorio de Biotecnología Reproductiva, Ecoparque, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [4 ] originalÁrea de Semiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: rungerfeld@ 123456gmail.com

                Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

                Author contributions RU: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Writing – review & editing; MV: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing; JGL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing; AS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing; FB: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Writing – review & editing; FF: Data curation, Writing – review & editing; AB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-2105
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-7969
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-2288
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0561-5760
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-3301
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-3546
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1193-3829
                Article
                arAO20200021 00203
                10.1590/1984-3143-AR2020-0021
                7375868
                4bf669a0-5eee-4cb6-bc64-b59eb06e2b28
                Copyright © The Author(s).

                Copyright © The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 March 2020
                : 11 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 42
                Categories
                Original Article

                cervid,electroejaculation,rut,seasonality,sperm
                cervid, electroejaculation, rut, seasonality, sperm

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content309

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors328