33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Taxonomic and functional trait diversity of wild bees in different urban settings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urbanization is one of the major anthropogenic processes contributing to local habitat loss and extirpation of numerous species, including wild bees, the most widespread pollinators. Little is known about the mechanisms through which urbanization impacts wild bee communities, or the types of urban green spaces that best promote their conservation in cities. The main objective of this study was to describe and compare wild bee community diversity, structure, and dynamics in two Canadian cities, Montreal and Quebec City. A second objective was to compare functional trait diversity among three habitat types (cemeteries, community gardens and urban parks) within each city. Bees were collected using pan traps and netting on the same 46 sites, multiple times, over the active season in 2012 and 2013. A total of 32,237 specimens were identified, representing 200 species and 6 families, including two new continental records, Hylaeus communis Nylander (1852) and Anthidium florentinum (Fabricius, 1775). Despite high community evenness, we found significant abundance of diverse species, including exotic ones. Spatio-temporal analysis showed higher stability in the most urbanized city (Montreal) but low nestedness of species assemblages among the three urban habitats in both cities. Our study demonstrates that cities are home to diverse communities of wild bees, but in turn affect bee community structure and dynamics. We also found that community gardens harbour high levels of functional trait diversity. Urban agriculture therefore contributes substantially to the provision of functionally diverse bee communities and possibly to urban pollination services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward.

              Functional diversity is a component of biodiversity that generally concerns the range of things that organisms do in communities and ecosystems. Here, we review how functional diversity can explain and predict the impact of organisms on ecosystems and thereby provide a mechanistic link between the two. Critical points in developing predictive measures of functional diversity are the choice of functional traits with which organisms are distinguished, how the diversity of that trait information is summarized into a measure of functional diversity, and that the measures of functional diversity are validated through quantitative analyses and experimental tests. There is a vast amount of trait information available for plant species and a substantial amount for animals. Choosing which traits to include in a particular measure of functional diversity will depend on the specific aims of a particular study. Quantitative methods for choosing traits and for assigning weighting to traits are being developed, but need much more work before we can be confident about trait choice. The number of ways of measuring functional diversity is growing rapidly. We divide them into four main groups. The first, the number of functional groups or types, has significant problems and researchers are more frequently using measures that do not require species to be grouped. Of these, some measure diversity by summarizing distances between species in trait space, some by estimating the size of the dendrogram required to describe the difference, and some include information about species' abundances. We show some new and important differences between these, as well as what they indicate about the responses of assemblages to loss of individuals. There is good experimental and analytical evidence that functional diversity can provide a link between organisms and ecosystems but greater validation of measures is required. We suggest that non-significant results have a range of alternate explanations that do not necessarily contradict positive effects of functional diversity. Finally, we suggest areas for development of techniques used to measure functional diversity, highlight some exciting questions that are being addressed using ideas about functional diversity, and suggest some directions for novel research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                peerj
                peerj
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                7 March 2017
                2017
                : 5
                : e3051
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre de Recherche en Innovation sur les Végétaux, Université Laval , Québec, Canada
                [2 ]Landscape Ecology & Plant Production Systems Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles , Bruxelles, Belgique
                [3 ]Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University , Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada
                Article
                3051
                10.7717/peerj.3051
                5344019
                28286711
                4cc7149b-bd07-474b-bc54-42dab7db5026
                ©2017 Normandin et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 11 January 2016
                : 31 January 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: NSERC (National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada)
                Funded by: NSERC-CANPOLIN
                This study was funded by the NSERC (National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada) Discovery Grants Program. We would like to thank NSERC-CANPOLIN (the Canadian pollinator initiative) for various scholarships to ÉN. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Biodiversity
                Conservation Biology
                Ecology
                Entomology
                Taxonomy

                urban ecology,urban agriculture,exotic species,dominant species,urbanization,synanthropic species,community ecology,bee survey,pollinator conservation,biodiversity

                Comments

                Comment on this article