4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Doing Internet research with hard-to-reach communities: methodological reflections on gaining meaningful access

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article contributes to scholarship on digital sociology by addressing the methodological challenge of gaining access to hard-to-reach online communities. We use assemblage theory to argue how collaborative efforts of human participants, digital technologies, techniques, authorities, cultural codes and the human researcher co-determine aspects of gaining access to online subjects. In particular, we analyse how credibility and reflexivity are assembled in an online research context. This is exemplified by our own experiences of researching hackers that dispute surveillance and the social embeddedness of darknet drug market users. In this article, we demonstrate the utility of an assemblage perspective for understanding the complexities involved in negotiating access to hard-to-reach communities in digital spaces.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research∗

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Qual Res
                Qual Res
                QRJ
                spqrj
                Qualitative Research
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1468-7941
                1741-3109
                16 February 2020
                December 2020
                : 20
                : 6
                : 927-944
                Affiliations
                [1-1468794120904898]University of Oslo, Norway
                [2-1468794120904898]University of Vienna, Austria; University of Oslo, Norway
                Author notes
                [*]Mareile Kaufmann, Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law, University of Oslo, St. Olavs plass 5, 0130 Oslo, Norway. Email: mareile.kaufmann@ 123456jus.uio.no
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-6021
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8257-7337
                Article
                10.1177_1468794120904898
                10.1177/1468794120904898
                7683880
                33281502
                4d56443a-5f9a-4f72-a0d8-02f7628dda25
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: austrian science fund, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002428;
                Award ID: J4095-G27
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                internet research,hard-to-reach communities,credibility,reflexivity,methodology,online research

                Comments

                Comment on this article