Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Literacy overrides effects of animacy: A picture-naming study with pre-literate German children and adult speakers of German and Arabic

      research-article
      1 , * , , 2 , 1
      PLOS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Animacy plays a key role for human cognition, which is also reflected in the way humans process language. However, while experiments on sentence processing show reliable effects of animacy on word order and grammatical function assignment, effects of animacy on conjoined noun phrases (e.g., fish and shoe vs. shoe and fish) have yielded inconsistent results. In the present study, we tested the possibility that effects of animacy are outranked by reading and writing habits. We examined adult speakers of German (left-to-right script) and speakers of Arabic (right-to-left script), as well as German preschool children who do not yet know how to read and write. Participants were tested in a picture naming task that presented an animate and an inanimate entity next to one another. On half of the trials, the animate entity was located on the left and, on the other half, it was located on the right side of the screen. We found that adult German and Arabic speakers differed in their order of naming. Whereas German speakers were much more likely to mention the animate entity first when it was presented on the left than on the right, a reverse tendency was observed for speakers of Arabic. Thus, in literate adults, the ordering of conjoined noun phrases was influenced by reading and writing habits rather than by the animacy status of an entity. By contrast, pre-literate children preferred to start their utterances with the animate entity regardless of position, suggesting that effects of animacy in adults have been overwritten by effects of literacy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The weirdest people in the world?

              Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                17 April 2024
                2024
                : 19
                : 4
                : e0298659
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [2 ] Department of Language and Culture, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
                The Psychology Research Center (CIPSI), University of Minho, PORTUGAL
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ SD and JS contributed equally to this work and shared first authorship on this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-6386
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-6629
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-7673
                Article
                PONE-D-23-25451
                10.1371/journal.pone.0298659
                11023297
                38630766
                4f5af85b-2ac0-4363-91d3-34a48a79d311
                © 2024 Dolscheid et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 August 2023
                : 30 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 23
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: Project-ID 281511265
                Award Recipient :
                This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) - Project-ID 281511265 - as part of the CRC 1252 “Prominence in Language” in the project B06 at the University of Cologne. The funding was awarded to MP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Habits
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Habits
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Children
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Children
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Academic Skills
                Literacy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Academic Skills
                Literacy
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Academic Skills
                Literacy
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Algebra
                Polynomials
                Binomials
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Grammar
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                Cross-Cultural Studies
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Grammar
                Syntax
                Custom metadata
                The data files and the R code for all models are openly available on OSF at https://osf.io/cz9ku/?view_only=797d95a6c9684a9aa6c0b954a1e3276d.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article