24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Societal Sentience : Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of nonhuman animals as models in research and drug testing is a key route through which contemporary scientific knowledge is certified. Given ethical concerns, regulation of animal research promotes the use of less “sentient” animals. This paper draws on a documentary analysis of legal documents and qualitative interviews with Named Veterinary Surgeons and others at a commercial laboratory in the UK. Its key claim is that the concept of animal sentience is entangled with a particular imaginary of how the general public or wider society views animals. We call this imaginary societal sentience. Against a backdrop of increasing ethnographic work on care encounters in the laboratory, this concept helps to stress the wider context within which such encounters take place. We conclude that societal sentience has potential purchase beyond the animal research field, in helping to highlight the affective dimension of public imaginaries and their ethical consequences. Researching and critiquing societal sentience, we argue, may ultimately have more impact on the fate of humans and nonhumans in the laboratory than focusing wholly on ethics as situated practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK: Passive Objects, Incipient Threats

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ethics, space, and somatic sensibilities: comparing relationships between scientific researchers and their human and animal experimental subjects

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Technol Human Values
                Sci Technol Human Values
                STH
                spsth
                Science, Technology & Human Values
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0162-2439
                25 October 2017
                July 2018
                : 43
                : 4 , Special Issue: Science, Culture, and Care in Laboratory Animal Research
                : 671-693
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Pru Hobson-West, Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK. Email: pru.hobson-west@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-0747
                Article
                10.1177_0162243917736138
                10.1177/0162243917736138
                6027268
                30008493
                4f638c85-739b-4403-81cb-886c2f6a448b
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Leverhulme Trust, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000275;
                Award ID: RP2011-SP-013
                Categories
                Articles

                ethics,sentience,imaginaries,veterinarians,animal research,public

                Comments

                Comment on this article