24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community-Based Control of the Brown Dog Tick in a Region with High Rates of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, 2012–2013

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) transmitted by the brown dog tick ( Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato) has emerged as a significant public health risk on American Indian reservations in eastern Arizona. During 2003–2012, more than 250 RMSF cases and 19 deaths were documented among Arizona's American Indian population. The high case fatality rate makes community-level interventions aimed at rapid and sustained reduction of ticks urgent. Beginning in 2012, a two year pilot integrated tick prevention campaign called the RMSF Rodeo was launched in a ∼600-home tribal community with high rates of RMSF. During year one, long-acting tick collars were placed on all dogs in the community, environmental acaricides were applied to yards monthly, and animal care practices such as spay and neuter and proper tethering procedures were encouraged. Tick levels, indicated by visible inspection of dogs, tick traps and homeowner reports were used to monitor tick presence and evaluate the efficacy of interventions throughout the project. By the end of year one, <1% of dogs in the RMSF Rodeo community had visible tick infestations five months after the project was started, compared to 64% of dogs in Non-Rodeo communities, and environmental tick levels were reduced below detectable levels. The second year of the project focused on use of the long-acting collar alone and achieved sustained tick control with fewer than 3% of dogs in the RMSF Rodeo community with visible tick infestations by the end of the second year. Homeowner reports of tick activity in the domestic and peridomestic setting showed similar decreases in tick activity compared to the non-project communities. Expansion of this successful project to other areas with Rhipicephalus-transmitted RMSF has the potential to reduce brown dog tick infestations and save human lives.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rocky Mountain spotted fever from an unexpected tick vector in Arizona.

          Rocky Mountain spotted fever is a life-threatening, tick-borne disease caused by Rickettsia rickettsii. This disease is rarely reported in Arizona, and the principal vectors, Dermacentor species ticks, are uncommon in the state. From 2002 through 2004, a focus of Rocky Mountain spotted fever was investigated in rural eastern Arizona. We obtained blood and tissue specimens from patients with suspected Rocky Mountain spotted fever and ticks from patients' homesites. Serologic, molecular, immunohistochemical, and culture assays were performed to identify the causative agent. On the basis of specific laboratory criteria, patients were classified as having confirmed or probable Rocky Mountain spotted fever infection. A total of 16 patients with Rocky Mountain spotted fever infection (11 with confirmed and 5 with probable infection) were identified. Of these patients, 13 (81 percent) were children 12 years of age or younger, 15 (94 percent) were hospitalized, and 2 (12 percent) died. Dense populations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks were found on dogs and in the yards of patients' homesites. All patients with confirmed Rocky Mountain spotted fever had contact with tick-infested dogs, and four had a reported history of tick bite preceding the illness. R. rickettsii DNA was detected in nonengorged R. sanguineus ticks collected at one home, and R. rickettsii isolates were cultured from these ticks. This investigation documents the presence of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in eastern Arizona, with common brown dog ticks (R. sanguineus) implicated as a vector of R. rickettsii. The broad distribution of this common tick raises concern about its potential to transmit R. rickettsii in other settings. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

            Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a life-threatening disease caused by Rickettsia rickettsii, an obligately intracellular bacterium that is spread to human beings by ticks. More than a century after its first clinical description, this disease is still among the most virulent human infections identified, being potentially fatal even in previously healthy young people. The diagnosis of RMSF is based on the patient's history and a physical examination, and often presents a dilemma for clinicians because of the non-specific presentation of the disease in its early course. Early empirical treatment is essential to prevent severe complications or a fatal outcome, and treatment should be initiated even in unconfirmed cases. Because there is no vaccine available against RMSF, avoidance of tick-infested areas is still the best way to prevent the infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tick ecology: processes and patterns behind the epidemiological risk posed by ixodid ticks as vectors.

              S Randolph (2003)
              The population ecology of ticks is fundamental to the spatial and temporal variation in the risk of infection by tick-borne pathogens. Tick population dynamics can only be fully understood by quantifying the rates of the demographic processes, which are influenced by both abiotic (climatic) factors acting on the free-living tick stages and biotic (host) responses to the tick as a parasite. Within the framework of a population model, I review methods and results of attempts to quantify (1) rates of tick development and the probability of diapause, (2) the probability of questing for hosts by unfed ticks, (3) the probability of ticks attaching to a host, and (4) tick mortality rates. Biologically, these processes involve the physiological and behavioural response of ticks to temperature, moisture stress and day length that result in specific patterns of seasonal population dynamics and host relationships. Temperate and tropical patterns will be illustrated with reference mostly to Ixodes ricinus and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, respectively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                5 December 2014
                : 9
                : 12
                : e112368
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
                [2 ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
                [3 ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
                [4 ]Arizona Department of Health Services, Department of Public Health Services, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
                [5 ]Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona Inc., Tribal Epidemiology Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
                [6 ]Indian Health Service, Office of Environmental Health and Engineering, Phoenix Area Unit, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
                [7 ]Indian Health Service, Infection Control Nurse, Phoenix Area Unit, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
                [8 ]Tribe B, Department of Health and Human Services, Arizona, United States of America
                University of Texas Medical Branch, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Bayer Healthcare donated Seresto dog collars as well as Bayer Advanced acaricidal spray that were used during the project. However, Bayer Healthcare and other funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: ND MM JG FSD NB EW KK SP. Performed the experiments: ND MM JG ST LA FSD NB EW KH JF SP JV TS BH CE AB PS CG HB RM JHM. Analyzed the data: ND ST LA FSD. Wrote the paper: ND MM JG ST LA FSD NB EW KH JF KK SP JV TS BH CE AB PS CG HB RH VW RM JHM.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-32103
                10.1371/journal.pone.0112368
                4257530
                25479289
                4fd1bc01-dd6c-431a-ab90-adb9d35f1dc6
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 17 July 2014
                : 30 September 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Funding
                Parts of this project were funded with CDC Emerging Infections funds. Spay and neuter services were partially provided through a grant from PetSmart Charities ( http://www.petsmartcharities.org/pro/grants/spay-neuter) managed by the CDC Foundation. Bayer Healthcare donated Seresto collars and Bayer Advanced acaricidal spray that were used during the project. Funding provided by Indian Health Service and Housing and Urban Development permitted purchase of collars and product and spay-neuter services in 2013. Additionally, financial and personnel contributions have been provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Arizona Department of Health Services, Intertribal Council of Arizona Inc., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Indian Health Service, and Tribe B. Students and staff at North Carolina State University and the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine donated their time in 2012 to help provide free spay and neuter capabilities to the tribe. Grantors had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Arachnida
                Ixodes
                Ticks
                Plant Science
                Plant Pathology
                Infectious Disease Epidemiology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Disease Vectors
                Environmental Epidemiology
                Health Care
                Environmental Health
                Public and Occupational Health
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Field Trials
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. The authors cannot make the data used in this manuscript available publicly. The data collected for this study contain potentially identifying information related to a vulnerable and sensitive population (a small American Indian tribe in eastern Arizona). There is no way to completely de-identify data, because of the tribe's small size. Furthermore, prior to starting the study, the tribal government required all research conducted on the reservation to be collected under a research agreement specifying the data would belong to the tribe, not the researchers, and that aside from this paper (which the tribal council approved), the data could not be shared publicly without additional tribal council approval. Any requests for the data would need to be directed to the tribe on an individual basis, and this could not be done without violating the tribe's request for anonymity. The authors began this project in 2012 under the agreement that the data were fully owned by the tribe and no publication or release of the data would occur without the tribe's expressed permission. The publication of this manuscript was only agreed upon after a tribal resolution was passed in June of 2014 following months of collaboration, editing and deliberation. This is a small community without their own IRB or scientific committee which could serve as a data access committee without compromising the anonymity of the tribe. The authors are the only parties who know the identity of the tribe, and do not feel it would be appropriate to act as a go-between for anonymous researchers to request data as it has the potential to compromise our relationship with the tribe. The figures and tables resulting from analysis provide summary measures which do not relay any sensitive or identifying information; raw data would not provide the same protections. The tribe has allowed for us to publish these data in their current, summary format only and the authors cannot deviate from the current tribal resolution. The Methods section contains the details of the study design to allow others to reproduce the study in a similar setting.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article