13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Susceptibility patterns and molecular identification of Trichosporon species.

      Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
      Amphotericin B, pharmacology, Antifungal Agents, Argentina, epidemiology, DNA, Fungal, analysis, genetics, DNA, Intergenic, DNA, Ribosomal, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Disease Susceptibility, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, Genetic, RNA, Fungal, RNA, Ribosomal, Retrospective Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Spain, Trichosporon, classification, drug effects, growth & development, isolation & purification, physiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The physiological patterns, the sequence polymorphisms of the internal transcriber spacer (ITS), and intergenic spacer regions (IGS) of the rRNA genes and the antifungal susceptibility profile were evaluated for their ability to identify Trichosporon spp. and their specificity for the identification of 49 clinical isolates of Trichosporon spp. Morphological and biochemical methodologies were unable to differentiate among the Trichosporon species. ITS sequencing was also unable to differentiate several species. However, IGS1 sequencing unambiguously identified all Trichosporon isolates. Following the results of DNA-based identification, Trichosporon asahii was the species most frequently isolated from deep sites (15 of 25 strains; 60%). In the main, other Trichosporon species were recovered from cutaneous samples. The majority of T. asahii, T. faecale, and T. coremiiforme clinical isolates exhibited resistance in vitro to amphotericin B, with geometric mean (GM) MICs >4 mug/ml. The other species of Trichosporon did not show high MICs of amphotericin B, and GM MICs were <1 mug/ml. Azole agents were active in vitro against the majority of clinical strains. The most potent compound in vitro was voriconazole, with a GM MIC

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article