1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender Differences and the Impact of Partnership and Children on Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic and its protective measures have changed the daily lives of families and may have affected quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to analyze gender differences in QoL and to examine individuals living in different partnership and family constellations.

          Methods: Data from the Gutenberg COVID-19 cohort study (N = 10,250) with two measurement time points during the pandemic (2020 and 2021) were used. QoL was assessed using the EUROHIS-QOL questionnaire. Descriptive analyses and autoregressive regressions were performed.

          Results: Women reported lower QoL than men, and QoL was significantly lower at the second measurement time point in both men and women. Older age, male gender, no migration background, and higher socioeconomic status, as well as partnership and children (especially in men), were protective factors for QoL. Women living with children under 14 and single mothers reported significantly lower QoL.

          Conclusion: Partnership and family were protective factors for QoL. However, women with young children and single mothers are vulnerable groups for lower QoL. Support is especially needed for women with young children.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on public mental health. Therefore, monitoring and oversight of the population mental health during crises such as a panedmic is an immediate priority. The aim of this study is to analyze the existing research works and findings in relation to the prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method In this systematic review and meta-analysis, articles that have focused on stress and anxiety prevalence among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic were searched in the Science Direct, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (ISI) and Google Scholar databases, without a lower time limit and until May 2020. In order to perform a meta-analysis of the collected studies, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of studies was investigated using the I2 index. Moreover. data analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results The prevalence of stress in 5 studies with a total sample size of 9074 is obtained as 29.6% (95% confidence limit: 24.3–35.4), the prevalence of anxiety in 17 studies with a sample size of 63,439 as 31.9% (95% confidence interval: 27.5–36.7), and the prevalence of depression in 14 studies with a sample size of 44,531 people as 33.7% (95% confidence interval: 27.5–40.6). Conclusion COVID-19 not only causes physical health concerns but also results in a number of psychological disorders. The spread of the new coronavirus can impact the mental health of people in different communities. Thus, it is essential to preserve the mental health of individuals and to develop psychological interventions that can improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Public Health
                Int J Public Health
                Int J Public Health
                International Journal of Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1661-8556
                1661-8564
                22 May 2023
                2023
                22 May 2023
                : 68
                : 1605826
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [2] 2 Center for Cardiology , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [3] 3 Partner Site Rhine-Main , DZHK , German Center for Cardiovascular Research , Bad Nauheim, Germany
                [4] 4 Institute of Molecular Biology , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [5] 5 Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [6] 6 Department of Cardiology I , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [7] 7 Eye Clinic and Polyclinic , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [8] 8 Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [9] 9 Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine , University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Florencia Borrescio-Higa, Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Chile

                Reviewed by: Daicia Price, University of Michigan, United States

                Athanasios Tsaraklis, Athens Chest Hospital Sotiria, Greece

                *Correspondence: Nora Hettich-Damm, nora.hettich@ 123456unimedizin-mainz.de
                Article
                1605826
                10.3389/ijph.2023.1605826
                10239859
                37284508
                5029e241-ae74-4d8f-ba27-16e1cf1df688
                Copyright © 2023 Hettich-Damm, Petersen, Zahn, Baumkoetter, Wild, Muenzel, Schuster, Koenig, Lackner, Pfeiffer, Beutel and Engwicht.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 January 2023
                : 10 May 2023
                Funding
                The study was funded by the European Regional Development Fund and the Ministry of Science and Health of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate (EFRE/REACT-EU, Grant Nos. 84007232 and 84009735); by the ReALity Initiative of the Life Sciences of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz for the establishment of a cell bank; and by the National University Medicine Research Network on COVID-19 (“NaFoUniMedCovid19”, Grant No. 01KX2021) B-FAST for the topics “poor living conditions” and “working conditions” and their association with COVID-19 in the population. Biomaterials were stored at the BioBank Mainz of the University Medical Center Mainz.
                Categories
                Public Health Archive
                Original Article

                Public health
                gender differences,coronavirus,quality of life,covid-19 pandemic,partnership
                Public health
                gender differences, coronavirus, quality of life, covid-19 pandemic, partnership

                Comments

                Comment on this article