123
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty.

          Related collections

          Most cited references175

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          What is beautiful is good, but . . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferences in human mate selection.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychological Bulletin
                Psychological Bulletin
                American Psychological Association (APA)
                1939-1455
                0033-2909
                2000
                2000
                : 126
                : 3
                : 390-423
                Article
                10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
                10825783
                508563f3-abe8-46f0-8192-0f98c1d03d3f
                © 2000
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article