1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New clinical prediction model for early recognition of sepsis in adult primary care patients: a prospective diagnostic cohort study of development and external validation

      research-article
      , MD , PhD , MD, PhD, GP , PhD , MSc , PhD, MD , MD, PhD , PhD, MD , PhD, MD , PhD, MD , FRCGP , PhD , MD , MD , PhD, MD , MD, GP , PhD, MD , PhD, MD , MD , PhD, MD , PhD, MD, GP , PhD, MD , PhD , PhD, MD , PhD, MD
      The British Journal of General Practice
      Royal College of General Practitioners
      after-hours care, clinical decision rule, diagnosis, general practice, sepsis, vital signs

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Recognising patients who need immediate hospital treatment for sepsis while simultaneously limiting unnecessary referrals is challenging for GPs.

          Aim

          To develop and validate a sepsis prediction model for adult patients in primary care.

          Design and setting

          This was a prospective cohort study in four out-of-hours primary care services in the Netherlands, conducted between June 2018 and March 2020.

          Method

          Adult patients who were acutely ill and received home visits were included. A total of nine clinical variables were selected as candidate predictors, next to the biomarkers C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate. The primary endpoint was sepsis within 72 hours of inclusion, as established by an expert panel. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards selection was used to design an optimal model with continuous clinical variables. The added value of the biomarkers was evaluated. Subsequently, a simple model using single cut-off points of continuous variables was developed and externally validated in two emergency department populations.

          Results

          A total of 357 patients were included with a median age of 80 years (interquartile range 71–86), of which 151 (42%) were diagnosed with sepsis. A model based on a simple count of one point for each of six variables (aged >65 years; temperature >38°C; systolic blood pressure ≤110 mmHg; heart rate >110/min; saturation ≤95%; and altered mental status) had good discrimination and calibration (C-statistic of 0.80 [95% confidence interval = 0.75 to 0.84]; Brier score 0.175). Biomarkers did not improve the performance of the model and were therefore not included. The model was robust during external validation.

          Conclusion

          Based on this study’s GP out-of-hours population, a simple model can accurately predict sepsis in acutely ill adult patients using readily available clinical parameters.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

          Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new look at the statistical model identification

            IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: PhD candidate
                Role: Senior researcher
                Role: Star-shl Diagnostic Centres
                Role: Assistant professor
                Role: Medical student
                Role: Professor of general practice
                Role: Assistant professor and GP
                Role: Associate professor and internist-infectiologist
                Role: Assistant professor, internist acute medicine, pharmacologist, and immunologist
                Role: Professor of general practice
                Role: Professor of general practice
                Role: Innovation manager
                Role: Emergency physician
                Role: Emergency physician
                Role: Internist-intensivist
                Role: General Practice Proosdijveld
                Role: Internist-intensivist
                Role: Internist acute medicine
                Role: Emergency physician
                Role: Assistant professor and GP
                Role: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
                Role: Hospitalist
                Role: Professor and specialist laboratory medicine
                Role: Professor and internist-intensivist
                Role: Professor of general practice
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                June 2022
                20 April 2022
                20 April 2022
                : 72
                : 719
                : e437-e445
                Affiliations
                Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
                Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
                Bredaseweg, the Netherlands.
                Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
                Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
                Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.
                Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
                Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
                Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
                Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
                Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
                Unilabs Netherlands, Enschede, the Netherlands.
                Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
                Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
                Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre; Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
                Beek, the Netherlands.
                Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre; School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
                Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Centre for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen the Netherlands.
                Emergency Department, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen; Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
                Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
                Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
                Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands.
                Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch; Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
                Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, Ede; Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
                Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Feike J Loots, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands. Email: f.j.loots@ 123456umcutrecht.nl

                Twitter: @theo_verheij

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-0484
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9073-5382
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8357-5197
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-7848
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-6462
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-5242
                Article
                10.3399/BJGP.2021.0520
                9037184
                35440467
                50913042-215e-4948-94b7-dc3bee729cf1
                © The Authors

                This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 08 September 2021
                : 19 October 2021
                : 04 January 2022
                Categories
                Research

                after-hours care,clinical decision rule,diagnosis,general practice,sepsis,vital signs

                Comments

                Comment on this article