Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective Associations of Accelerometer‐Measured Machine‐Learned Sedentary Behavior With Death Among Older Women: The OPACH Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sedentary behavior is a recognized mortality risk factor. The novel and validated convolutional neural network hip accelerometer posture algorithm highly accurately classifies sitting and postural changes compared with accelerometer count cut points. We examined the prospective associations of convolutional neural network hip accelerometer posture–classified total sitting time and mean sitting bout duration with all‐cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) death.

          Methods and Results

          Women (n=5856; mean±SD age, 79±7 years; 33% Black women, 17% Hispanic or Latina women, 50% White women) in the Women's Health Initiative Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) Study wore the ActiGraph GT3X+ for ~7 days from May 2012 to April 2014 and were followed through February 19, 2022 for all‐cause and CVD death. The convolutional neural network hip accelerometer posture algorithm classified total sitting time and mean sitting bout duration from GT3X+ output. Over follow‐up (median, 8.4 years; range, 0.1–9.9), there were 1733 deaths (632 from CVD). Adjusted Cox regression hazard ratios (HRs) comparing women in the highest total sitting time quartile (>696 min/d) to those in the lowest (<556.0 min/d) were 1.57 (95% CI; 1.35–1.83; P‐trend<0.001) for all‐cause death and 1.78 (95% CI; 1.36–2.31; P‐trend<0.001) for CVD death. HRs comparing women in the longest mean sitting bout duration quartile (>15 minutes) to the shortest (<9.3 minutes) were 1.43 (95% CI; 1.23–1.66; P‐trend<0.001) for all‐cause death and 1.52 (95% CI; 1.18–1.96; P‐trend<0.001) for CVD death. Apparent nonlinear associations for total sitting time suggested higher all‐cause death ( P nonlinear=0.009) and CVD death ( P nonlinear=0.008) risk after ~660 to 700 min/d.

          Conclusions

          Higher total sitting time and longer mean sitting bout duration are associated with higher all‐cause and CVD mortality risk among older women. These data support interventions aimed at reducing both total sitting time and interrupting prolonged sitting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies.A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

            Background: The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). Methods: The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2022 Statistical Update is the product of a full year’s worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year’s edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population and an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, and the global burden of cardiovascular disease and healthy life expectancy. Results: Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. Conclusions: The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations

              Accelerometers are widely used to measure sedentary time, physical activity, physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), and sleep-related behaviors, with the ActiGraph being the most frequently used brand by researchers. However, data collection and processing criteria have evolved in a myriad of ways out of the need to answer unique research questions; as a result there is no consensus. Objectives The purpose of this review was to: (1) compile and classify existing studies assessing sedentary time, physical activity, energy expenditure, or sleep using the ActiGraph GT3X/+ through data collection and processing criteria to improve data comparability and (2) review data collection and processing criteria when using GT3X/+ and provide age-specific practical considerations based on the validation/calibration studies identified. Methods Two independent researchers conducted the search in PubMed and Web of Science. We included all original studies in which the GT3X/+ was used in laboratory, controlled, or free-living conditions published from 1 January 2010 to the 31 December 2015. Results The present systematic review provides key information about the following data collection and processing criteria: placement, sampling frequency, filter, epoch length, non-wear-time, what constitutes a valid day and a valid week, cut-points for sedentary time and physical activity intensity classification, and algorithms to estimate PAEE and sleep-related behaviors. The information is organized by age group, since criteria are usually age-specific. Conclusion This review will help researchers and practitioners to make better decisions before (i.e., device placement and sampling frequency) and after (i.e., data processing criteria) data collection using the GT3X/+ accelerometer, in order to obtain more valid and comparable data. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016039991.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                stn013@health.ucsd.edu
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                27 February 2024
                05 March 2024
                : 13
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.v13.5 )
                : e031156
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Epidemiology Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
                [ 2 ] Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA USA
                [ 3 ] Center for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children’s Mercy Kansas City Kansas City MO USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions University at Buffalo – SUNY Buffalo NY USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Steve Nguyen, PhD, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093.

                Email: stn013@ 123456health.ucsd.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5193-7042
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7167-3048
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-3586
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-581X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6008-7983
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-828X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6669-5242
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-976X
                Article
                JAH39306 JAHA/2023/031156
                10.1161/JAHA.123.031156
                10944026
                38410939
                5142b4f8-7b85-4fbb-9514-1863b96292a0
                © 2024 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 31 May 2023
                : 14 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 7671
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging , doi 10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: 5T32AG058529‐03
                Award ID: K99AG082863
                Award ID: P01AG052352
                Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute,
                Award ID: R01 HL105065
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , doi 10.13039/100000016;
                Award ID: 75N92021D00005
                Award ID: 75N92021D00004
                Award ID: 75N92021D00003
                Award ID: 75N92021D00002
                Award ID: 75N92021D00001
                Funded by: Tobacco‐Related Disease Research Program
                Award ID: 31KT1501
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases , doi 10.13039/100000062;
                Award ID: R01DK114945
                Categories
                Original Research
                JAHA Spotlight: Go Red for Women
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                05 March 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:07.03.2024

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                aging,epidemiology,public health,women's health
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                aging, epidemiology, public health, women's health

                Comments

                Comment on this article