13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prism adaptation treatment for upper-limb complex regional pain syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

          Two weeks of prism adaptation treatment for unilateral upper-limb complex regional pain syndrome I showed no benefits for pain or symptom severity compared with sham treatment.

          Abstract

          Initial evidence suggested that people with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) have reduced attention to the affected side of their body and the surrounding space, which might be related to pain and other clinical symptoms. Three previous unblinded, uncontrolled studies showed pain relief after treatment with prism adaptation, an intervention that has been used to counter lateralised attention bias in brain-lesioned patients. To provide a robust test of its effectiveness for CRPS, we conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial of prism adaptation for unilateral upper-limb CRPS-I. Forty-nine eligible adults with CRPS were randomized to undergo 2 weeks of twice-daily home-based prism adaptation treatment (n = 23) or sham treatment (n = 26). Outcomes were assessed in person 4 weeks before and immediately before treatment, and immediately after and 4 weeks after treatment. Long-term postal follow-ups were conducted 3 and 6 months after treatment. We examined the effects of prism adaptation vs sham treatment on current pain intensity and the CRPS symptom severity score (primary outcomes), as well as sensory, motor, and autonomic functions, self-reported psychological functioning, and experimentally tested neuropsychological functions (secondary outcomes). We found no evidence that primary or secondary outcomes differed between the prism adaptation and sham treatment groups when tested at either time point after treatment. Overall, CRPS severity significantly decreased over time for both groups, but we found no benefits of prism adaptation beyond sham treatment. Our findings do not support the efficacy of prism adaptation treatment for relieving upper-limb CRPS-I. This trial was prospectively registered (ISRCTN46828292).

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

            Research on dispositional optimism as assessed by the Life Orientation Test (Scheier & Carver, 1985) has been challenged on the grounds that effects attributed to optimism are indistinguishable from those of unmeasured third variables, most notably, neuroticism. Data from 4,309 subjects show that associations between optimism and both depression and aspects of coping remain significant even when the effects of neuroticism, as well as the effects of trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem, are statistically controlled. Thus, the Life Orientation Test does appear to possess adequate predictive and discriminant validity. Examination of the scale on somewhat different grounds, however, does suggest that future applications can benefit from its revision. Thus, we also describe a minor modification to the Life Orientation Test, along with data bearing on the revised scale's psychometric properties.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python

              The vast majority of studies into visual processing are conducted using computer display technology. The current paper describes a new free suite of software tools designed to make this task easier, using the latest advances in hardware and software. PsychoPy is a platform-independent experimental control system written in the Python interpreted language using entirely free libraries. PsychoPy scripts are designed to be extremely easy to read and write, while retaining complete power for the user to customize the stimuli and environment. Tools are provided within the package to allow everything from stimulus presentation and response collection (from a wide range of devices) to simple data analysis such as psychometric function fitting. Most importantly, PsychoPy is highly extensible and the whole system can evolve via user contributions. If a user wants to add support for a particular stimulus, analysis or hardware device they can look at the code for existing examples, modify them and submit the modifications back into the package so that the whole community benefits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pain
                Pain
                JPAIN
                Pain
                JOP
                Pain
                Wolters Kluwer (Philadelphia, PA )
                0304-3959
                1872-6623
                February 2021
                21 August 2020
                : 162
                : 2
                : 471-489
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
                [b ]Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
                [c ]Department of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
                [d ]Department of Translational Medicine, Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [e ]Department of Pain Medicine, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [f ]Optimise Pain Rehabilitation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [g ]Department of Computer Science, Centre for Real & Virtual Environments Augmentation Labs, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Address: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford St South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 (0)1517941398. E-mail address: mon.halicka@ 123456gmail.com (M. Halicka).
                Article
                PAIN-D-20-00311 00014
                10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002053
                7808368
                32833791
                516dd90f-d7b6-4849-b180-67f60e888bcc
                Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 15 March 2020
                : 14 July 2020
                : 03 August 2020
                Categories
                Research Paper
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                video
                T

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                complex regional pain syndrome,prism adaptation,randomized controlled trial,attention,pain,crps symptom severity,body representation,neuropsychology,neglect

                Comments

                Comment on this article