6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma. Comparison of spiral-CTAP combined with intravenous contrast-enhanced spiral-CT and SPIO-enhanced MR combined with plain MR imaging.

      Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)
      Adenocarcinoma, diagnosis, pathology, radiography, secondary, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Colonic Neoplasms, Contrast Media, Dextrans, Female, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Follow-Up Studies, Hepatectomy, Humans, Image Enhancement, methods, Infusions, Intravenous, Intraoperative Care, Iron, diagnostic use, Liver Neoplasms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetite Nanoparticles, Male, Middle Aged, Oxides, Portography, Prospective Studies, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Rectal Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Single-Blind Method, Suspensions, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Interventional

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR with and without SPIO (AMI-25) could replace spiral-CTAP in the staging of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Thirty-five patients were studied prospectively by means of i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT, spiral-CTAP, and MR of the liver. MR imaging was performed before and after infusion of AMI-25. Diagnoses were compared to intraoperative findings (n = 35) which included intraoperative ultrasound (n = 21), and follow-up CT (n = 18). Fifteen patients were found to have a total number of 53 liver metastases and 43 benign lesions were detected. Evaluation was performed in four different ways: 1) i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT; 2) i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT + spiral-CTAP; 3) plain MR; 4) plain MR + SPIO-enhanced MR. I.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT, spiral-CTAP and SPIO-enhanced MR identified patients with liver metastases with equal sensitivity. However, owing to its significantly higher sensitivity, based on a lesion-by-lesion analysis, spiral-CTAP cannot be replaced by SPIO-enhanced MR in patients who are to undergo liver resection. A limitation in spiral-CTAP is its relatively low specificity.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article