0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Salvage chemotherapy regimens for acute myeloid leukemia: Is one better? Efficacy comparison between CLAG and MEC regimens.

      Leukemia Research
      Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, therapeutic use, Cladribine, Cytarabine, Etoposide, Female, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, drug therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Mitoxantrone, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Remission Induction, Retrospective Studies, Salvage Therapy, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is no standard salvage regimen for AML. We retrospectively compared two commonly used regimens at our institution: CLAG and MEC. The complete response rate (CR) was 37.9% for CLAG (n=97) and 23.8% for MEC (n=65) (P=0.048), with median overall survival (OS) of 7.3 and 4.5 months, respectively (P=0.05). In primary refractory disease, CR was 45.5% for CLAG and 22.2% for MEC (P=0.09), with median OS of 11 and 4.5 months, respectively (P=0.07). In first relapse, CR was 36.8% and 25.9% (P=0.35) and median OS was 6.7 and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.87). Our data support use of CLAG for RR-AML. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article