For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
10
views
1
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      1,911
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correction: Refinement of the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire: cognitive interviews with women and healthcare professionals and a validation survey

      correction

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Correction: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 325 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04626-x Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that the 2nd author “Research Officer” should be deleted from the author group. Research Officer was incorrectly added to the author list. The original article [1] has been corrected.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Refinement of the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire: cognitive interviews with women and healthcare professionals and a validation survey

          Laura Kelly, Research Officer, Jennifer J. Kurinczuk … (2022)
          Background Measuring positive and negative aspects of well-being during pregnancy and childbirth is important for both healthy women and women who are living with long-term health conditions (LTCs). This study aimed to further refine the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire and to incorporate LTC specific items where appropriate. Methods A multi-method study. Cognitive interviews with pregnant or postpartum women (n = 11) and consultations with healthcare professionals (n = 11) and public representatives (n = 4) were conducted to explore the acceptability of existing WiP items and content. Items were refined and subsequently administered on an online survey (n = 768). Item reduction steps and exploratory factor analysis were performed on survey data. Convergent validity was examined using Pearson correlation coefficients to compare relationships with other included validated assessments. Results Following amendments to three items, the addition of eight core WiP items and five LTC specific items, a total of 25 items were considered relevant and appropriate for use with pregnant women. Analysis of survey data reduced the questionnaire to 12 items measuring three core WiP scales; 1) Concerns over support after birth, 2) Positive pregnancy and, 3) Confidence about motherhood, and a five item standalone LTC specific scale. All scales demonstrated good validity and internal reliability. Scores for the three core scales moderately correlated with established well-being measures indicating that they were measuring similar, yet distinct concepts. Conclusions Analyses confirmed good psychometric properties of the refined WiP questionnaire. The use of pregnancy specific well-being measures, such as the WiP, provide a route into asking women in more detail about how their care may be tailored to support them and also facilitates positive conversations with women about how care and experience of pregnancy and childbirth may be enhanced further. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04626-x.
          Article 0 comments Cited 4 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            All references

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Fiona Alderdice:
            ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-5644
            Fiona.alderdice@npeu.ox.ac.uk
            Journal
            Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
            Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
            Title: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
            Publisher: BioMed Central (London )
            ISSN (Electronic): 1471-2393
            Publication date (Electronic): 12 May 2022
            Publication date PMC-release: 12 May 2022
            Publication date Collection: 2022
            Volume: 22
            Electronic Location Identifier: 403
            Affiliations
            [1 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Health Services Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
            [2 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Harris Manchester College, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
            [3 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, NIHR Policy Research Unit Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, , University of Oxford, ; Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-5644
            Article
            Publisher ID: 4730
            DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04730-y
            PMC ID: 9102357
            PubMed ID: 35549893
            SO-VID: 52982cf0-802e-4ed2-b240-6e4d3d1d07bb
            Copyright © © The Author(s) 2022
            License:

            Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

            History
            Related
            Categories
            Subject: Correction
            Custom metadata
            issue-copyright-statement © The Author(s) 2022

            ScienceOpen disciplines: Obstetrics & Gynecology
            Data availability:
            ScienceOpen disciplines: Obstetrics & Gynecology

            Comments

            Comment on this article